You are currently viewing Meaning and Definition of Contract

Meaning and Definition of Contract

Meaning and Definition of Contract- A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that establishes obligations, rights, and terms agreed upon by the parties. It is enforceable by law and typically involves an exchange of promises or commitments.

Key Elements of a Contract:

  1. Offer: One party proposes terms to another.
  2. Acceptance: The other party agrees to the terms of the offer.
  3. Consideration: Something of value (e.g., money, services, goods) exchanged between the parties.
  4. Intention to Create Legal Relations: Both parties must intend for the agreement to be legally enforceable.
  5. Capacity: Parties must have the legal ability to enter into a contract (e.g., age, mental competence).
  6. Legality: The purpose of the contract must be lawful.

Contracts can be written, oral, or implied, but written contracts are generally preferred to avoid disputes and ensure clarity.

What is Required Meaning and Definition of Contract

The term โ€œrequiredโ€ in the context of a contract typically refers to elements or conditions that must be present for the contract to be legally valid or enforceable.

Required Elements of a Contract:

  1. Offer: One party must make a clear proposal to do something or refrain from doing something.
  2. Acceptance: The offer must be accepted by the other party without any conditions or changes.
  3. Consideration: There must be something of value exchanged between the parties (e.g., money, goods, services).
  4. Mutual Consent: Both parties must willingly agree to the terms of the contract, free from fraud, duress, or misrepresentation.
  5. Capacity: The parties must be legally able to enter into the contract (e.g., age, mental competence).
  6. Legality: The subject matter of the contract must be lawful and not against public policy.

In short, โ€œrequiredโ€ refers to these essential conditions that must be met for the agreement to be considered a valid contract under the law.

Who is Required Meaning and Definition of Contract

The term โ€œwho is requiredโ€ in the context of a contract refers to the parties involved in the contract. These are the individuals, companies, or organizations who enter into the agreement and are legally bound by its terms.

Key Parties Who Are Required in a Contract:

  1. Offeror: The person or entity who makes the offer. This party initiates the contract by proposing terms.
  2. Offeree: The person or entity who receives the offer and must decide whether to accept or reject it.
  3. Other Parties (if applicable): In some contracts, multiple parties may be involved, such as in joint ventures, partnerships, or contracts with third-party beneficiaries. All these parties have specific roles and obligations outlined in the contract.

Requirements for the Parties:

  • Capacity: Parties must have the legal ability to enter into a contract, meaning they must be of legal age and mentally competent.
  • Intent: There must be a clear intention to create a legal relationship between the parties.
  • Voluntary Agreement: All parties must agree to the contract terms without coercion, fraud, or misrepresentation.

So, โ€œwho is requiredโ€ refers to the individuals or entities that must meet these conditions in order to form a valid and enforceable contract.

When is Required Meaning and Definition of Contract

The term โ€œwhen is requiredโ€ in the context of a contract typically refers to the timing or circumstances under which a contract is necessary, valid, or enforceable. A contract may be required or come into effect under specific conditions.

When is a Contract Required:

  1. When a Transaction Occurs: A contract is required when parties agree to exchange goods, services, or promises, and they wish to ensure that the agreement is legally binding.
  2. When Legal Obligations Arise: If there is a legal requirement for an agreement between parties (e.g., employment contracts, real estate transactions, business partnerships), a formal contract is needed to ensure both parties fulfill their obligations.
  3. When Protection is Needed: A contract is required to provide protection for all parties involved by clearly stating rights, duties, and responsibilities, minimizing risks, and ensuring enforcement in case of a dispute.
  4. When Creating Specific Terms: If the parties intend to define specific terms such as payment schedules, timelines, or performance requirements, a contract is required to formalize these details and make them enforceable.

When a Contract Becomes Enforceable:

A contract becomes enforceable when all required elements (offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual consent, capacity, and legality) are present and the parties have entered into the agreement under valid circumstances.

Thus, a contract is required when a formal, legally binding agreement is needed to outline terms, protect rights, and ensure compliance.

Where is Required Meaning and Definition of Contract

The term โ€œwhere is requiredโ€ in the context of a contract refers to the location or context in which a contract is necessary or applicable. It can also refer to the specific situations or places where a contract must be created or enforced.

Where is a Contract Required:

  1. Legal Contexts: A contract is required in various legal contexts such as:
    • Business transactions: Contracts are necessary when businesses enter into agreements with customers, suppliers, or other businesses.
    • Employment: Employment contracts are required to outline the terms of the employer-employee relationship.
    • Real Estate: Contracts are required in property transactions (e.g., buying or leasing property) to protect both partiesโ€™ rights.
    • Financial Agreements: Contracts are required in situations involving loans, investments, or other financial transactions.
  2. Specific Locations: Contracts may be required in various physical or geographical locations, such as:
    • Courts: A contract may be required to establish proof of an agreement in legal disputes or lawsuits.
    • Government or Regulatory Settings: Certain contracts are required by law or regulation, such as government contracts or regulated industries (e.g., healthcare, construction).
  3. International or Cross-Border Transactions: In cross-border transactions, contracts are often required to comply with the laws of the countries involved, ensuring that each partyโ€™s rights and obligations are clear and enforceable across jurisdictions.

Where Contracts Are Created or Enforced:

  • Written Contracts: Often required in formal business dealings, real estate, or when significant sums of money or property are involved.
  • Oral Contracts: In some informal settings, an oral contract may be valid (though harder to enforce).

So, a contract is required wherever a formal, legally binding agreement is needed to define terms, rights, and obligations in various legal, business, or personal contexts.

How is Required Meaning and Definition of Contract

The phrase โ€œhow is requiredโ€ in the context of a contract refers to the process or method by which a contract must be formed, executed, and made legally binding. It involves the steps and conditions that need to be met to create a valid contract.

How a Contract is Required:

  1. Offer and Acceptance: A contract is created when one party makes an offer, and the other party accepts that offer. This can happen through written communication, verbal agreement, or actions that indicate acceptance.
  2. Consideration: The contract must involve something of value (known as consideration), such as money, goods, or services, exchanged between the parties.
  3. Mutual Consent: Both parties must agree voluntarily to the terms without being coerced, under duress, or through fraudulent means. Mutual consent is typically demonstrated through signatures or actions showing acceptance.
  4. Capacity: The parties involved must have the legal ability to enter into a contract, meaning they must be of legal age and mentally competent to understand the terms and obligations.
  5. Legality: The subject matter of the contract must be legal. Contracts for illegal activities are not enforceable.
  6. Form: While some contracts can be made orally, certain contracts (such as real estate transactions or employment agreements) may need to be in writing, depending on the jurisdiction or the nature of the agreement.

How Contracts Are Executed:

  • In Writing: Some contracts, such as for the sale of real property or long-term agreements, must be written to be enforceable.
  • Orally: In certain situations, oral contracts can be legally binding, though proving the terms of the agreement can be more difficult in case of a dispute.
  • Electronically: In the digital age, many contracts are signed electronically or through digital platforms, provided they meet the legal requirements.

In summary, a contract is required to be formed through a series of specific actions and conditions, such as offer, acceptance, consideration, and mutual consent, and it must adhere to the legal requirements based on the nature of the agreement.

Case Study on Meaning and Definition of Contract

Background: ABC Corporation, a software development company, enters into a contract with XYZ Enterprises, a retail business, to develop a customized e-commerce platform. The contract outlines the scope of work, the payment terms, timelines, and other specific requirements for the project.

Key Elements of the Contract in the Case Study:

  1. Offer:
    • ABC Corporation offers to provide a custom-built e-commerce platform to XYZ Enterprises in exchange for payment.
    • The offer includes detailed specifications about the features and functionalities of the platform.
  2. Acceptance:
    • XYZ Enterprises accepts the offer by signing the contract, agreeing to the terms and conditions, and providing an initial deposit for the work.
  3. Consideration:
    • The consideration in this case is the agreed-upon amount for the development and delivery of the e-commerce platform, along with the services ABC Corporation will provide during the development process.
    • XYZ Enterprises agrees to pay a total of $100,000 in installments based on milestones achieved.
  4. Mutual Consent:
    • Both parties freely and voluntarily agree to the contractโ€™s terms. There is no evidence of fraud, duress, or misrepresentation. Both parties clearly understand their roles, obligations, and responsibilities.
  5. Capacity:
    • Both ABC Corporation (a legally registered company) and XYZ Enterprises (also a legally recognized entity) have the legal capacity to enter into the contract.
    • Both parties are competent to understand and agree to the terms of the contract.
  6. Legality:
    • The subject matter of the contractโ€”the development of an e-commerce platformโ€”is entirely legal, and the contract does not involve any illegal activities.
  7. Form:
    • The contract is written, signed by representatives of both companies, and outlines the payment terms, deliverables, timelines, and penalties for non-performance.
    • As the contract involves a significant sum and a project with defined milestones, a written agreement is required for legal protection and clarity.

Dispute Scenario:

After six months, ABC Corporation delays the delivery of the e-commerce platform, causing frustration for XYZ Enterprises. XYZ Enterprises claims that the delay is a breach of contract and demands compensation for lost sales.

Resolution:

Upon review, it is found that the contract includes clauses for the following:

  • Timeline and deadlines: A specific delivery schedule was agreed upon.
  • Penalties for delay: The contract contains a provision for penalties if ABC Corporation fails to deliver on time.

XYZ Enterprises can take legal action based on the terms of the contract, claiming breach of contract and enforcing the penalty provisions.

Conclusion:

In this case study, the contract between ABC Corporation and XYZ Enterprises demonstrates the key elements of a valid contract, including offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual consent, capacity, legality, and form. The contract is legally binding, and both parties are required to fulfill their obligations as outlined. The dispute that arose shows how important it is to have clear, legally enforceable terms to resolve potential conflicts in business agreements.

This case illustrates how the definition and meaning of a contract apply in real-world scenarios to ensure accountability and legal protection for all parties involved.

White paper on Meaning and Definition of Contract

Executive Summary:

A contract is a fundamental component of modern legal systems and is essential for regulating business, personal, and governmental relationships. This white paper aims to explore the meaning and definition of a contract, explaining its key components, its role in legal systems, and its significance in different areas of life and business. By providing a detailed analysis, this paper will demonstrate how contracts serve as legal tools to define rights, obligations, and expectations, ensuring clarity and enforcement in a variety of contexts.

1. Introduction

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, governed by mutual consent, consideration, and the intention to create enforceable legal obligations. The role of contracts is pivotal in regulating transactions, managing relationships, and resolving disputes across personal, commercial, and governmental spheres.

This paper delves into the essential components that make up a valid contract, the legal principles behind its formation, and its practical applications in everyday life.

2. Definition of a Contract

At its core, a contract is an agreement between parties that is legally enforceable. The basic components of a contract include:

  • Offer: One party presents terms or promises to another.
  • Acceptance: The other party agrees to the terms without modification.
  • Consideration: Something of value is exchanged (e.g., money, goods, or services).
  • Mutual Consent: All parties agree to the terms voluntarily and knowingly.
  • Capacity: The parties must have the legal ability to enter into the agreement.
  • Legality: The contractโ€™s purpose must be lawful.
  • Form: Some contracts must be in writing to be enforceable (e.g., real estate transactions).

These elements form the foundation of a contractโ€™s legal enforceability and ensure that all parties have a clear understanding of their obligations and rights.

3. Key Elements of a Contract

For a contract to be legally valid, it must meet the following requirements:

3.1. Offer and Acceptance

A contract begins when one party makes an offer to another, who then accepts that offer. This exchange of offers and acceptances solidifies the terms of the agreement. An offer must be clear, specific, and communicated to the offeree, who can then accept, reject, or counter the terms.

3.2. Consideration

Consideration refers to the value exchanged in the agreement. This can be in the form of money, goods, services, or even an agreement to refrain from an action. It is a critical element that distinguishes a contract from a gift.

Both parties must agree to the contractโ€™s terms willingly. This agreement must be free from elements like fraud, duress, or misrepresentation, as such factors would invalidate the contract.

3.4. Capacity

Parties entering into a contract must have the legal capacity to do so. This typically means that they must be of legal age (usually 18 or older) and mentally competent to understand the nature of the agreement. Minors, intoxicated individuals, or those with limited mental capacity may not be able to form valid contracts.

3.5. Legality

The subject matter of the contract must be legal. A contract based on illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking, fraud) is void and unenforceable in the eyes of the law.

3.6. Form

While many contracts can be oral or implied, some contracts require a specific form, often written, to be legally binding. Examples include contracts for real estate transactions, wills, or contracts exceeding a certain monetary value.

4. Types of Contracts

Contracts come in various forms, and understanding their classifications is important for determining their requirements, enforceability, and application.

4.1. Bilateral Contracts

A bilateral contract involves mutual promises where both parties exchange something of value. For example, a business contract where one party agrees to deliver goods, and the other party agrees to pay for them.

4.2. Unilateral Contracts

A unilateral contract involves one party offering something in exchange for an action. For example, a reward contract where one party promises to pay for the return of lost property.

4.3. Express Contracts

An express contract occurs when the terms are clearly stated (either orally or in writing). These contracts are straightforward and explicitly define the rights and obligations of each party.

4.4. Implied Contracts

An implied contract is formed through the actions or conduct of the parties, rather than explicit words. For example, when a person orders food at a restaurant, an implied contract is formed for the provision of services and payment.

5. Importance of Contracts

Contracts serve as essential tools for creating predictable and enforceable outcomes in various areas:

5.1. Business and Commerce

In business, contracts govern transactions, employment agreements, partnerships, sales, and intellectual property rights. They provide clarity on expectations and responsibilities, minimizing the risk of disputes and litigation.

5.2. Personal and Family Agreements

Contracts are also used in personal agreements, such as prenuptial agreements, leases, and loans. These agreements help manage personal assets, rights, and obligations within families or between individuals.

Contracts offer protection by ensuring that both parties understand their legal obligations. In the event of a breach, contracts outline remedies such as compensation, damages, or specific performance, providing a clear pathway for resolving disputes.

A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their obligations under the terms of the agreement. Common causes for breach include non-performance, late performance, or defective performance.

Legal remedies for breach of contract include:

  • Damages: Compensation for losses incurred due to the breach.
  • Specific Performance: A court order requiring the party in breach to fulfill their obligations as promised.
  • Rescission: The cancellation of the contract and a return to the status quo.

The presence of a contract provides a legal framework for enforcing these remedies.

7. Conclusion

A contract is a crucial legal tool for regulating relationships, setting expectations, and ensuring that promises made by parties are enforceable in a court of law. Whether in business, personal matters, or government, contracts provide structure and clarity, ensuring that parties can trust each other to fulfill their obligations. The key elementsโ€”offer, acceptance, consideration, mutual consent, capacity, legality, and formโ€”serve as the foundation of all legally binding agreements. Understanding these elements is critical for parties to navigate the complexities of modern contracts successfully.

By adhering to these principles, parties can avoid misunderstandings, minimize legal risks, and foster trust in their transactions.

8. Recommendations

  • Awareness and Education: Individuals and businesses should educate themselves about the essential elements of contracts to protect their interests and avoid unintended liabilities.
  • Legal Review: It is advisable to seek legal counsel before entering into complex agreements to ensure that the contract is well-drafted and enforceable.
  • Clear Communication: All terms should be clearly outlined and understood by both parties before signing a contract, minimizing the potential for disputes.

Industrial Application of Meaning and Definition of Contract

Courtesy: Ganesh Poojary โ€“ Law for All

Introduction:

Contracts play a vital role in industrial operations, serving as legal tools that define the rights, obligations, and expectations of the parties involved in various transactions. In an industrial context, contracts govern relationships between businesses, suppliers, employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Understanding the meaning and definition of a contract is crucial for ensuring legal compliance, reducing risks, and maintaining smooth operations in the industrial sector.

This section explores how contracts are applied in industrial settings and highlights their importance in managing business activities.

1. Contractual Applications in Industry

In the industrial sector, contracts are used in various areas to formalize agreements, protect interests, and ensure accountability. Below are key applications:

1.1. Supply Chain and Procurement Contracts

Contracts are fundamental in managing the procurement of goods and services. Industrial businesses frequently enter into agreements with suppliers to obtain raw materials, equipment, and services necessary for their operations.

  • Supply Agreements: These define the terms of supply, including quantities, delivery schedules, quality specifications, and payment terms.
  • Purchasing Contracts: These outline the purchase of machinery, equipment, and tools, ensuring that both parties adhere to agreed terms related to costs, warranties, and timelines.

Contracts in supply chain management help mitigate risks associated with delays, quality issues, and non-performance, ensuring smooth production processes.

1.2. Employment Contracts

In industrial settings, employment contracts are essential to formalize the relationship between employers and workers. These contracts specify:

  • Job Responsibilities: Clearly define the tasks, job descriptions, and expectations for employees.
  • Wages and Benefits: Outline compensation, benefits, working hours, overtime pay, and other entitlements.
  • Health and Safety: Ensure that safety regulations are in place, and employees are informed of their rights and responsibilities regarding workplace safety.

These contracts protect both the employee and employer by setting clear expectations and ensuring compliance with labor laws.

1.3. Manufacturing Agreements

Manufacturing contracts are used when one party (the manufacturer) agrees to produce goods or components for another party (the buyer). Such agreements are common in industries such as electronics, automotive, and consumer goods.

Key terms in manufacturing agreements include:

  • Specifications and Standards: Defining the technical specifications and quality standards for the products.
  • Timelines and Delivery: Establishing delivery schedules and penalties for delays.
  • Intellectual Property: Addressing the ownership of intellectual property and patents related to designs or products.

These contracts ensure that the manufacturing process meets quality and efficiency standards and protects against intellectual property disputes.

1.4. Construction Contracts

In industries like construction and infrastructure development, contracts are critical to defining the scope of work, timelines, and responsibilities between the contractor, subcontractors, and clients. Construction contracts generally include:

  • Project Scope: Detailed specifications of the work to be performed.
  • Cost Estimates: Clear outlines of project costs, payment schedules, and budgeting.
  • Dispute Resolution: Mechanisms for resolving conflicts that may arise during the course of the project.

By clearly defining each partyโ€™s responsibilities, construction contracts help mitigate the risks associated with large-scale projects and prevent misunderstandings or legal disputes.

1.5. Sales and Distribution Agreements

In industries where goods are sold or distributed, sales and distribution contracts define the terms of selling and delivering products. These agreements outline:

  • Pricing: Agreed pricing for products or services and any discount structures.
  • Territory: Define the geographical region or market where goods can be sold.
  • Liability and Returns: Clauses regarding product warranties, returns, and liability for defective goods.

These contracts are particularly significant in sectors like consumer goods, electronics, pharmaceuticals, and automotive, ensuring that all parties adhere to agreed terms for the transfer of goods.

2.1. Risk Mitigation through Contractual Clauses

Industrial contracts often include provisions to mitigate risks associated with performance failures, delays, or unforeseen circumstances. Common risk management clauses include:

  • Force Majeure: Provides protection against events like natural disasters, strikes, or unforeseen circumstances that prevent performance.
  • Indemnification: Ensures that one party compensates the other for damages, losses, or claims arising out of the contract.
  • Insurance Requirements: Requires parties to carry insurance to cover specific risks, such as property damage, liability, or worker injury.

By including these clauses, businesses can limit their exposure to legal and financial risks in industrial contracts.

2.2. Dispute Resolution

Contracts in industrial settings often include dispute resolution mechanisms to address conflicts without resorting to litigation. Common methods include:

  • Arbitration: A third party settles the dispute outside of court, providing a quicker resolution.
  • Mediation: A neutral party facilitates a negotiated settlement between the parties.
  • Litigation: In some cases, contracts may specify that disputes will be handled through the court system.

Dispute resolution clauses provide clear guidance on how conflicts should be handled, reducing the potential for lengthy and costly legal battles.

3. Enforcement of Contractual Obligations

In industrial contracts, enforcement is key to ensuring that both parties fulfill their obligations. Common enforcement mechanisms include:

  • Penalties for Non-Compliance: Contracts may specify financial penalties or other consequences if a party fails to meet their obligations (e.g., late delivery or substandard quality).
  • Performance Bonds: In large-scale construction or manufacturing projects, performance bonds may be used to guarantee that the contractor will complete the project according to specifications.

Having clear enforcement provisions ensures that parties are motivated to meet their commitments and minimizes the risk of non-compliance.

4. Conclusion

Contracts are indispensable in the industrial sector, providing a structured framework for defining relationships, managing risks, and ensuring that all parties fulfill their obligations. Whether in supply chain management, employment, manufacturing, construction, or sales, contracts create clarity and legal certainty in industrial operations. By incorporating key elements like offer, acceptance, consideration, and dispute resolution mechanisms, industrial contracts help mitigate risks, safeguard business interests, and foster smooth, productive relationships between businesses and stakeholders.

In conclusion, the meaning and definition of a contract are central to maintaining order and legal compliance in the industrial world. Effective use of contracts enhances efficiency, reduces conflict, and ensures the enforceability of business arrangements, ultimately contributing to the success and sustainability of industrial enterprises.

References

  1. ^ย โ€œContracts is Not Promise; Contract is Consentโ€.ย Suffolk U. L. Rev. 8 March 2021. Retrievedย 11 Augustย 2024.
  2. ^ย โ€œCase Note โ€“ Contract Law โ€“ Rule of Law Institute of Australiaโ€,ย Rule of Law Institute of Australia, 2018-05-31, retrievedย 2018-09-14
  3. ^ย โ€œInternational Legal Researchโ€.ย law.duke.edu. Retrievedย 2024-01-30.
  4. ^ย Hans Wehberg,ย Pacta Sunt Servanda,ย The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Oct., 1959),ย p.775.; Trans-Lex.orgย Principle of Sanctity of contracts
  5. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย eย fย gย hย iย jย kย lย mย nย oย pย qย rย sย tย uย vย wย xย yย zย aaย UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts
  6. ^ย Beatson,ย Ansonโ€™s Law of Contractย (1998) 27th ed. OUP, p.21
  7. ^ย Martin, E [ed] & Law, J [ed],ย Oxford Dictionary of Law, ed6 (2006, London:OUP).
  8. ^ย Reuer, Jeffrey J.; Ariรฑo, Africa (March 2007). โ€œStrategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexityโ€.ย Strategic Management Journal.ย 28ย (3): 313โ€“330.ย doi:10.1002/smj.581.
  9. ^ย For the assignment of claim seeย Trans-Lex.org
  10. ^ย Malhotra, Deepak; Murnighan, J. Keith (2002). โ€œThe Effects of Contracts on Interpersonal Trustโ€.ย Administrative Science Quarterly.ย 47ย (3): 534โ€“559.ย doi:10.2307/3094850.ย ISSNย 0001-8392.ย JSTORย 3094850.ย S2CIDย 145703853.
  11. ^ย Poppo, Laura; Zenger, Todd (2002).ย โ€œDo formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?โ€.ย Strategic Management Journal.ย 23ย (8): 707โ€“725.ย doi:10.1002/smj.249.ย ISSNย 1097-0266.
  12. ^ย The Hawala Alternative Remittance System and its Role in Money Launderingย (PDF)ย (Report).
  13. ^ย Badr, Gamal Moursi (Spring 1978). โ€œIslamic Law: Its Relation to Other Legal Systemsโ€.ย American Journal of Comparative Law.ย 26ย (2 [Proceedings of an International Conference on Comparative Law, Salt Lake City, Utah, February 24โ€“25, 1977]): 187โ€“98.ย doi:10.2307/839667.ย JSTORย 839667.
  14. ^ย Badr, Gamal Moursi (Spring 1978). โ€œIslamic Law: Its Relation to Other Legal Systemsโ€.ย The American Journal of Comparative Law.ย 26ย (2 [Proceedings of an International Conference on Comparative Law, Salt Lake City, Utah, February 24โ€“25, 1977]): 187โ€“98 [196โ€“8].ย doi:10.2307/839667.ย JSTORย 839667.
  15. ^ย Egyptian Civil Codeย 1949, Article 1
  16. ^ย Willmott, L, Christensen, S, Butler, D, & Dixon, B 2009ย Contract Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, North Melbourne
  17. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Bernstein DE. (2008).ย Freedom of Contract. George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 08-51.
  18. ^ย Douglas D. (2002).ย Contract Rights and Civil Rights.ย Michigan Law Review.
  19. ^ย Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 2003 (Singapore)
  20. ^ย โ€ฆ indeed the Code was neither published nor adopted by the UK, instead being privately published by an Italian University
  21. ^ย Atiyah PS. (1986)ย Medical Malpractice and Contract/Tort Boundary.ย Law and Contemporary Problems.
  22. ^ย In England, contracts of employment must either be in writing (Employment Rights Act 1996), or else a memorandum of the terms must be promptly supplied; and contracts for the sale of land, and most leases, must be completed by deed (Law of Property Act 1925).
  23. ^ย โ€œContractsโ€.ย www.lawhandbook.sa.gov.au. Retrievedย 2018-09-14.
  24. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Hadley v Baxendaleย [1854] EWHC J70,ย ERย 145,ย High Courtย (England and Wales).
  25. ^ย as inย Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltdย andย The Mihalis Angelos
  26. ^ย Theย Indian Contract Act 1872ย s.2a
  27. ^ย Enright, Mรกirรฉad (2007).ย Principles of Irish Contract Law. Clarus Press.
  28. ^ย Theย Indian Contract Act 1872ย s.2b
  29. ^ย DiMatteo L. (1997).ย The Counterpoise of Contracts: The Reasonable Person Standard and the Subjectivity of Judgmentย Archivedย 2013-01-15 at theย Wayback Machine.ย South Carolina Law Review.
  30. ^ย George Hudson Holdings Ltd v Rudder (1973) 128ย CLRย 387ย [1973] HCA 10,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  31. ^ย Theย Uniform Commercial Codeย disposes of the mirror image rule in ยง2-207, although the UCC only governs transactions in goods in the USA.
  32. ^ย George, James (February 2004). โ€œContract lawโ€”itโ€™s only as good as the peopleโ€.ย Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America.ย 22ย (1): 217โ€“224.ย doi:10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00094-4.ย PMIDย 15062506.
  33. ^ย Feinman JM, Brill SR. (2006).ย Is an Advertisement an Offer? Why it is, and Why it Matters[permanent dead link].ย Hastings Law Journal.
  34. ^ย Wilmot et al, 2009,ย Contract Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, page 34
  35. ^ย Partridge v Crittendenย [1968] 1 WLR 1204
  36. ^ย Harris v Nickersonย (1873) LR8QB 286[permanent dead link]
  37. ^ย Household Fire Insurance v Grantย 1879
  38. ^ย Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Coย [1892] EWCA Civ 1, [1893] 2ย QBย 256,ย Court of Appealย (England and Wales).
  39. ^ย Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltdย Archivedย 2016-08-17 at theย Wayback Machine, 1953, 1 Q.B. 401
  40. ^ย Currie v Misaย (1875) LR 10 Ex 893
  41. ^ย Enright, Mรกirรฉad (2007).ย Principles of Irish Contract Law. Dublin 8: Clarus Press. p.ย 75.
  42. ^ย Wade v Simeonย (1846) 2 CB 548
  43. ^ย White v Bluettย (1853) 2 WR 75
  44. ^ย Bronaugh R. (1976).ย Agreement, Mistake, and Objectivity in the Bargain Theory of Conflict.ย William & Mary Law Review.
  45. ^ย UCCย ยงย 2-205
  46. ^ย Collins v. Godefroyย (1831) 1 B. & Ad. 950.
  47. ^ย Theย Indian Contract Act 1872ย s.2d
  48. ^ย Chappell & Co Ltd v. Nestle Co Ltdย [1959] 2 All ER 701 in which the wrappers from three chocolate bars was held to be part of the consideration for the sale and purchase of a musical recording.
  49. ^ย e.g. P.S. Atiyah, โ€œConsideration: A Restatementโ€ inย Essays on Contractย (1986) p.195, Oxford University Press
  50. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Lโ€™Estrange v Graucobย [1934] 2ย KBย 394.
  51. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltdย [2004] HCA 52, (2004) 219ย CLRย 165 (11 November 2004),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  52. ^ย Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Coย [1951] 1 KB 805
  53. ^ย Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertsonย [1906] HCA 83,ย (1906) 4ย CLRย 379ย (18 December 1906),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  54. ^ย Baltic Shipping Company v Dillonย [1993] HCA 4, (1993) 176ย CLRย 344,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  55. ^ย Michida S. (1992)ย Contract Societies: Japan and the United States Contrasted.ย Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal.
  56. ^ย โ€œLaws affecting contractsโ€.ย business.gov.au. 2018-07-18. Retrievedย 2018-09-14.
  57. ^ย Taylor, Martyn (2021-09-01).ย โ€œSale and Storage of Goods in Australia: Overviewโ€.ย Practical Law. Thomson Reuters. Retrievedย 2021-10-16.
  58. ^ย Trans-Lex.org:ย international principle
  59. ^ย Burchfield, R.W. (1998).ย The New Fowlerโ€™s Modern English Usageย (Revised 3rdย ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp.ย 820โ€“821.ย ISBNย 0198602634.ย Expressed or conveyed by speech instead of writing; oralโ€ฆ e.g. verbal agreement, contract, evidence
  60. ^ย Garner, Bryan A. (1999).ย Blackโ€™s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. West Publishing Company.ย ISBNย 978-0-314-15234-3.
  61. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastingsย [1977] UKPC 13, (1977) 180ย CLRย 266,ย Privy Councilย (on appeal from Australia).
  62. ^ย Fry v. Barnesย (1953) 2 D.L.R. 817 (B.C.S.C)
  63. ^ย Hillas and Co. Ltd. v. Arcos Ltd.ย (1932) 147 LT 503
  64. ^ย Seeย Aiton Australia Pty Ltd v Transfield Pty Ltdย (1999) 153 FLR 236ย Thomson Reutersย Archivedย 2016-08-17 at theย Wayback Machine
  65. ^ย Whitlock v Brewย [1968] HCA 71, (1968) 118ย CLRย 445 (31 October 1968),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  66. ^ย Three Rivers Trading Co., Ltd. v. Gwinear & District Farmers, Ltd.ย (1967) 111 Sol. J. 831
  67. ^ย โ€œCutter v Powellโ€ (1795) 101 ER 573
  68. ^ย Swarbrick, D.,ย Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd v Gilbert Ash (Northern) Ltd: HL 1974, updated on 4 August 2022, accessed on 17 September 2024. This case is referred to as an authority in this regard in the High Court case ofย Stocznia Gdynia SA v Gearbulk Holdings Ltd., paragraph 9, delivered on 2 May 2008, accessed on 17 September 2024
  69. ^ย Moloo, Rahim; Jacinto, Justin (2010).ย Mediation Techniques: Drafting International Mediation Clauses. London: International Bar Association.ย ISBNย 9780948711237.
  70. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Gillies P. (1988).ย Concise Contract Law,ย p. 105. Federation Press.
  71. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Luna Park (NSW) Ltd v Tramways Advertising Pty Ltdย [1938] HCA 66,ย (1938) 61ย CLRย 286ย (23 December 1938),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  72. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย West GD, Lewis WB.,ย Contracting to Avoid Extra-Contractual Liabilityโ€”Can Your Contractual Deal Ever Really Be the โ€œEntireโ€ Deal?ย The Business Lawyer, volume 64, August 2009, archived on 7 January 2011, accessed on 17 September 2024.
  73. ^ย Koffman L, MacDonald E. (2007).ย The Law of Contract. Oxford University Press.
  74. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Burling JM. (2011). Research Handbook on International Insurance Law and Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  75. ^ย Poussard v Spiers and Pondย (1876) 1 QBD 410
  76. ^ย Bettini v Gyeย (1876) 1 QBD 183
  77. ^ย As added by the Sale of Goods Act 1994 s4(1).
  78. ^ย Primack MA. (2009).ย Representations, Warranties and Covenants: Back to the Basics in Contracts.ย National Law Review.
  79. ^ย Ferara LN, Philips J, Runnicles J. (2007).ย Some Differences in Law and Practice Between U.K. and U.S. Stock Purchase Agreementsย Archivedย 2013-05-14 at theย Wayback Machine.ย Jones Day Publications.
  80. ^ย Bannerman v Whiteย [1861] EngR 713; (1861) 10 CBNS 844, Court of Common Pleas (United Kingdom).
  81. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Bissett v Wilkinsonย [1927]ย ACย 177.
  82. ^ย Tettenbornย et alย (2017),ย Contractual Duties: Performance, Breach, Termination and Remedies, second edition, at paragraph 10-036, quoted by Klein J. in England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division),ย C21 London Estates Ltd v Maurice Macneill Iona Ltd & Anor, [2017] EWHC 998 (Ch), delivered 10 May 2017, accessed 8 September 2023
  83. ^ย See for a discussion of the position in English law, theย article on Capacity in English law
  84. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 39
  85. ^ย Elements of a Contract โ€“ Contracts
  86. ^ย Edge, Robert G. (1 December 1967). โ€œVoidability of Minorsโ€™ Contracts: A Feudal Doctrine in a Modern Economy Economyโ€.ย Georgia Law Review.ย 1ย (2): 40.
  87. ^ย Chandler, Adrian; Brown, Ian (2007).ย Q and A: Law of Contract. U.K.: Oxford University Press. p.ย 57.ย ISBNย 9780199299553.
  88. ^ย Civil Law Act 1909 s35-36 (Singapore).
  89. ^ย Minorsโ€™ Contracts Act 1987
  90. ^ย Mental Capacity Act 2008 s4 (Singapore)
  91. ^ย Mental Capacity Act 2008 s11 (Singapore)
  92. ^ย Part 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2008 (Singapore)
  93. ^ย The Moorcockย (1889) 14 PD 64.
  94. ^ย J Spurling Ltd v Bradshawย [1956] EWCA Civ 3, [1956] 2ย All ERย 121,ย Court of Appealย (England and Wales)
  95. ^ย Hutton v Warrenย [1836] M&W 466
  96. ^ย Marine Insurance Act 1909 s.17 (Singapore)
  97. ^ย Marine Insurance Act 1909 s.5 (Singapore)
  98. ^ย Insurance Act 1966 s.146 (Singapore)
  99. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Report on Reforming Insurance Law in Singaporeย (Singapore Academy of Law)
  100. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Con-stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltdย [1986] HCA 14, (1986) 160ย CLRย 226 (11 April 1986),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  101. ^ย McKendrick, E. (2000), โ€œContract Lawโ€, Fourth edition, p. 377
  102. ^ย Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
  103. ^ย Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltdย [1962] 1 All ER 474; see alsoย Associated Newspapers Ltd v Bancksย [1951] HCA 24, (1951) 83ย CLRย 322,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  104. ^ย The Mihailis Angelos [1971] 1 QB 164
  105. ^ย Bellgrove v Eldridgeย [1954] HCA 36, (1954) 90ย CLRย 613 (20 August 1954),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  106. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commissionย [1951] HCA 79,ย (1951) 84ย CLRย 377,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  107. ^ย [1972] 1 QB 60
  108. ^ย Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltdย [1914] UKHL 1, [1915]ย ACย 79 at 86 per Lord Dunedin,ย House of Lordsย (UK).
  109. ^ย Awad v. Dover, 2021 ONSC 5437 (CanLII)
  110. ^ย Fern Investments Ltd. v. Golden Nugget Restaurant (1987) Ltd., 1994 ABCA 153 (CanLII)
  111. ^ย Bidell Equipment LP v Caliber Midstream GP LLC, 2020 ABCA 478 (CanLII)
  112. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Articles 2226โ€“2228
  113. ^ย Cavendish Square Holdings BV v Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67 (Cavendish)
  114. ^ย Paciocco v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2016] HCA 28
  115. ^ย Theย UCCย states, โ€œConsequential damagesโ€ฆ include any lossโ€ฆ which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise.โ€ UCC 2-715.In English law the chief authority on mitigation isย British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co v Underground Electric Railway Co of London[1912] AC 673, see especially 689 per Lord Haldane.
  116. ^ย M. P. Furmston,ย Cheshire, Fifoot & Furmstonโ€™s Law of Contract, 15th edn (OUP: Oxford, 2007) p.779.
  117. ^ย M.P. Furmston,ย Cheshire, Fifoot & Furmstonโ€™s Law of Contract, 15th edn (OUP: Oxford, 2007) p.779 n.130.
  118. ^ย Sotiros Shipping Inc v Sameiet, The Solholtย [1983] 1 Lloydโ€™s Rep 605.
  119. ^ย See alsoย Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corp Ltdย (1987) 9ย NSWLRย 310.
  120. ^ย โ€œ13th Amendment to the United States Constitutionโ€. Retrievedย 2020-12-26.
  121. ^ย Public Contracts (Amendments) Regulations 2009, (SI 2009โ€“2992)
  122. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book Three, Chapter Seven, Article 563
  123. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Knapp, Charles; Crystal, Nathan; Prince, Harry (2007).ย Problems in Contract Law: Cases and Materialsย (4thย ed.). Aspen Publishers/Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. p.ย 659.
  124. ^ย Public Trustee v Taylorย [1978] VicRp 31, [1978]ย VRย 289 (9 September 1977),ย Supreme Courtย (Vic, Australia).
  125. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Bix, Brian (2012).ย Contract Law: Rules, Theory, and Context. Cambridge University Press. pp.ย 44โ€“45.
  126. ^ย Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Mardonย [1976] 2 Lloydโ€™s Rep. 305
  127. ^ย Misrepresentation Act 1967
  128. ^ย Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (New Zealand)
  129. ^ย Fuller, Lon; Eisenberg, Melvin (2001).ย Basic Contract Lawย (7thย ed.). West Group. p.ย 388.
  130. ^ย Fitzpatrick v Michelย [1928] NSWStRp 19, (1928) 28ย SR (NSW)ย 285 (2 April 1928),ย Supreme Courtย (NSW, Australia).
  131. ^ย Bell v. Lever Brothers Ltd.ย [1931] ALL E.R. Rep. 1, [1932] A.C. 161
  132. ^ย See alsoย Svanosi v McNamaraย [1956] HCA 55,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  133. ^ย Great Peace Shipping Ltd v Tsavliris Salvage (International) Ltdย [2002] EWCA Civ 1407,ย Court of Appealย (England and Wales).
  134. ^ย Raffles v Wichelhausย (1864) 2 Hurl. & C. 906.
  135. ^ย Smith v. Hughesย [1871].
  136. ^ย Taylor v Johnsonย [1983] HCA 5,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  137. ^ย Lewis v Averyย [1971] EWCA Civ 4, [1971] 3ย All ERย 907,ย Court of Appealย (England and Wales).
  138. ^ย โ€œAre you bound once you sign a contract?โ€.ย Legal Services Commission of South Australia. 2009-12-11. Archived fromย the originalย on 2016-10-10. Retrievedย 2016-10-10.
  139. ^ย Blackโ€™s Law Dictionaryย (8th ed. 2004)
  140. ^ย Johnson v Buttressย [1936] HCA 41,ย (1936) 56ย CLRย 113ย (17 March 1936),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  141. ^ย See alsoย Westmelton (Vic) Pty Ltd v Archer and Shulmanย [1982] VicRp 29,ย Supreme Courtย (Vic, Australia).
  142. ^ย Odorizzi v. Bloomfield Sch. Dist., 246 Cal. App. 2d 123 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1966)
  143. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadioย [1983] HCA 14, (1983) 151ย CLRย 447 (12 May 1983),ย High Courtย (Australia).
  144. ^ย See alsoย Blomley v Ryanย [1956] HCA 81, (1956) 99ย CLRย 362,ย High Courtย (Australia).
  145. ^ย โ€œLegislation โ€“ Australian Consumer Lawโ€.ย consumerlaw.gov.au. Archived fromย the originalย on 2018-09-14. Retrievedย 2018-09-14.
  146. ^ย Royal Bank of Canada v. Newellย 147 D.L.R (4th) 268 (N.C.S.A.).ย 1996 caseย andย 1997 appeal.
  147. ^ย Tenet v. Doe,ย 544ย U.S.ย 1ย (2005).
  148. ^ย Frustrated Contracts Act 1959 (Singapore)
  149. ^ย Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (New Zealand), subpart 4
  150. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book Three, Chapter Four, Article 527
  151. ^ย Benjaminโ€™s Sale of Goods, 8th edition, para 8-092, quoted inย High Court of Justice,ย Dunavant Enterprises Incorporated v Olympia Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd [2011] EWHC 2028 (Comm), paragraph 29, delivered 29 July 2011, accessed 21 December 2023
  152. ^ย Joanna Benjamin,ย Financial Lawย (2007, Oxford University Press), p264
  153. ^ย Louise Gullifer,ย Goode and Gullifer on Legal Problems of Credit and Security, Sweet & Maxwell, 7th ed., 2017
  154. ^ย โ€œAnnotated Civil Code of Quebec -Englishโ€. Lexum. Archived fromย the originalย on 2012-07-07. Retrievedย 2012-01-14.
  155. ^ย โ€œNOMINATE CONTRACT, civil lawโ€.ย law dictionary, a free online law dictionary search engine for definitions of law terminology & legal terms. law-dictionary.org. Archived fromย the originalย on 2011-10-18. Retrievedย 2012-01-14.
  156. ^ย โ€œไธญๅŽไบบๆฐ‘ๅ…ฑๅ’Œๅ›ฝๆฐ‘ๆณ•ๅ…ธ-ๅ…จๆ–‡โ€.ย Government of China. 2020-06-01. Archived fromย the originalย on 2020-09-07 โ€“ via State Council of Peopleโ€™s Republic of China.
  157. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book Three, Chapter Four, Article 509
  158. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 35.
  159. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Articles 41, 42.
  160. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Articles 38, 39, 40.
  161. ^ย Florian Faust, โ€œContractual Penalties in German Lawโ€, (2015), 23, European Review of Private Law, Issue 3, pp. 285โ€“296,ย [1]
  162. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 25.
  163. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 49, 64.
  164. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Articles 74, 75, 76, 77.
  165. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 81.
  166. ^ย Cfย Doulton Potteries v Bronotteย (1971) 1 NSWLR 591 for example of damages as inadequate.
  167. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Articles 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 61, 62, 63, 65, 74, 75, 76, 77.
  168. ^ย Hadley v Baxendaleย (1854) 9 Exch 341.
  169. ^ย Jacob Ziegel and Claude Samson โ€œReport to the Uniform Law Conference of Canada on Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goodsโ€ (1981) Toronto 168โ€“305.
  170. ^ย Benson v SA Mutual Lifeย 1986 (1) SA 776 (A) at 779H.
  171. ^ย Benson v SA Mutual Lifeย at 777A.
  172. ^ย Santos v Igesundย 2003 (5) SA 73 (C) at 86H.
  173. ^ย 1951 (2) SA 371 (A).
  174. ^ย Santos v Igesund.
  175. ^ย French Civil Code, article 1128
  176. ^ย Art. 1385 C.c.Q.
  177. ^ย โ€œArticle 1109 du Code civilโ€ย (in French). Legifrance. Retrievedย 2020-08-13.
  178. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1385
  179. ^ย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1410
  180. ^ย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1412
  181. ^ย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1413
  182. ^ย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1416
  183. ^ย โ€œOrdon Estate v. Grail, 1998 CanLII 771 (SCC), [1998] 3 SCR 437โ€.
  184. ^ย Bills of Exchange Act R.S.C., 1985, c. B-4ย section 52(1).ย Accessed 1 June 2022
  185. ^ย C.M. Callow Inc. v. Zollinger, 2020 SCC 45ย paragraph 3
  186. ^ย Book Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 6
  187. ^ย Book Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 7
  188. ^ย Book Five, Title Oneย of theย Civil Code of Quebecย โ€“ Section 1375
  189. ^ย Warren H.O. Mueller, B.A., LL.B., LL.M., Q.C. and D. Morgan, B.A., LL.B, LL.M.ย โ€œContractsโ€. Westlaw Canada. Retrievedย 28 Mayย 2022.
  190. ^ย Du Plessis, Jacques (2012). Dale Hutchison; Chris-James Pretorius; Mark Townsend; Helena Janisch (eds.).ย The Law of Contract in South Africaย (2ndย ed.).ย Cape Town,ย Western Cape:ย Oxford University Press.ย ISBNย 9780199055111.ย OCLCย 794731751.ย (later editions available)
  191. ^ย Fellmeth & Horwitz,ย Guide to Latin in International Lawย (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011)ย ISBNย 9780195369380
  192. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Gibson 2003:10
  193. ^ย Van Huyssteen & Maxwell,ย Contract Law in South Africa, ยง 50.
  194. ^ย โ€œAlexander Broadie, 1942 -, Professor of Logic and Rhetoric, University of Glasgowโ€. Archived fromย the originalย on 15 August 2010. Retrievedย 1 Octoberย 2007.
  195. ^ย Contract (Scotland Act 1997), 1997 c.34
  196. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Act 2017, 2017 asp. 5
  197. ^ย Civil Code (Amended 2008.05.23)
  198. ^ย โ€œMinistry of Justice, R.O.C. (Taiwan)โ€.
  199. ^ย โ€œTaiwan Contract Law โ€“ (Symposium on the Evolution of Private Law in China and Taiwan (Contract Law Session), College of Law, National Taiwan University 2014โ€ย (PDF). Archived fromย the originalย (PDF)ย on 2022-06-18. Retrievedย 2022-05-27.
  200. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 71
  201. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 72
  202. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 73
  203. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 153
  204. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 161
  205. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 471
  206. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 472
  207. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 476
  208. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 479
  209. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 483
  210. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 473
  211. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 469
  212. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book 3, Chapter 2, Article 470
  213. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 75
  214. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 79
  215. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 76
  216. ^ย Civil Code of the Republic of Chinaย Article 83
  217. ^ย Hayes, Sean (2023-10-17).ย โ€œValid and Enforceable Contracts in Korea: Korean Contract Law Basicsโ€.ย The Korean Law Blog by IPG Legal. Retrievedย 2023-10-17.
  218. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย eย fย gย hย iย โ€œOutline of Contract Law in Japanโ€.ย Group for the Law concerning International Sales of Goods and International Service Contracts. School of Law, Tohoku University. Retrievedย 26 Mayย 2022.
  219. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Yamashita, Y. (2018-01-11). Formation of Contract in Japan. In Formation and Third Party Beneficiaries.ย : Oxford University Press. Retrieved 26 May. 2022, fromย [2]
  220. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Landini, Sara (2021) โ€œThe Idea of Contract in Japanese Law and Cultureโ€, Japanese Society and Culture: Vol. 3 , Article 9. DOI: 10.52882/2434-1738-0309 Available at:ย [3]
  221. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1305
  222. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1306
  223. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1308
  224. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1311
  225. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1356
  226. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1318
  227. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1319
  228. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1347
  229. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1350
  230. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1359
  231. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1362
  232. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1363
  233. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1364
  234. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1369
  235. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1367
  236. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1380
  237. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1382
  238. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1381
  239. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1383
  240. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1384
  241. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1385
  242. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1390
  243. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1403
  244. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 1409
  245. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 2227
  246. ^ย Philippine Civil Code (Republic Act No. 386)ย Archivedย 2022-05-11 at theย Wayback Machineย Article 2228
  247. ^ย Kuran, Timurย (Fall 2005). โ€œThe Absence of the Corporation in Islamic Law: Origins and Persistenceโ€.ย The American Journal of Comparative Law.ย 53ย (4): 785โ€“834.ย doi:10.1093/ajcl/53.4.785.ย hdl:10161/2546.ย JSTORย 30038724.
  248. ^ย Paul Powers (2005).ย Intent in Islamic Law: Motive and Meaning in Medieval Sunnฤซ Fiqh. Brill Academic. pp.ย 97โ€“110, 125โ€“41.ย ISBNย 978-9004145924.
  249. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Administration of Muslim Law Act 1966
  250. ^ย Irfan, Harris (2015).ย Heavenโ€™s Bankers. Overlook Press. p.ย 135.
  251. ^ย Usmani, Taqi (1998).ย An Introduction to Islamic Finance. Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0. p.ย 65. Retrievedย 2015-08-04.
  252. ^ย โ€œEndowment Charter (Waqfiyya) of Haseki Hรผrrem Sultanโ€.ย Discover Islamic Art.
  253. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย eย Waแธณf,ย Encyclopaedia of Islam
  254. ^ย United States Department of Commerce, โ€˜The U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goodsโ€™ย โ€œU.n. Convention on International Sale of Goodsโ€. Archived fromย the originalย on 2007-05-05. Retrievedย 2007-04-02.ย at 22 December 2007.
  255. ^ย Standard clauses in English and in German (opt-in/opt-out): See Verweyen,ย Foerster, Toufarย Handbuch des Internationalen Warenkaufs UN-Kaufrecht (CISG)ย Archivedย 2017-07-08 at theย Wayback Machineย 2. Auflage, 2008 pg. 64ย (in English and German)
  256. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 1 (b).
  257. ^ย More correctly, the law ofย New South Walesย as mandated in Sale of Goods (Vienna Convention) Act 1986 (NSW).
  258. ^ย Specifically, China, Germany, Czech Republic, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Singapore, Slovakia, and the United States of America.ย Seeย http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/sale_goods/1980CISG_status.htmlย at 22 December 2007.
  259. ^ย Article 2.
  260. ^ย Fromย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goodsย Article 2 (d) and (f), intangibles such asย stocks,ย shares,ย investment securities,ย negotiable instrumentsย or money, and electricity.
  261. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 3- However, Sale of Goods contracts under the CISG may include services (e.g., transport, erection, supervision, training) up to 50% of the agreed contract price at the date of the signature of the contract (Seeย Verweyen/Foerster/Toufar Handbuch des Internationalen Warenkaufs UN-Kaufrechts (CISG) 2. Auflage, 2008 2.1.1 p. 46)
  262. ^ย Peter Schlechtriem, โ€œRequirements of Application and Sphere of Applicability of the CISGโ€ (2005) 36ย Victoria University of Wellington Law Reviewย 781.
  263. ^ย Frank Diedrich, โ€œMaintaining Uniformity in International Uniform Law Via Autonomous Interpretation: Software Contracts and the CISGโ€ (1996) 8ย Pace International Law Reviewย 303, 321, 322.
  264. ^ย Articles 6, 12.
  265. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 14.
  266. ^ย See, for example,ย Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Companyย (1892) 2 QB 484.
  267. ^ย Article 14 (2).
  268. ^ย Article 55.
  269. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Articles 15, 16 (1).
  270. ^ย Article 16 (2).
  271. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 18.
  272. ^ย United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 19.
  273. ^ย e.g. in Germany,ย Bรผrgerliches Gesetzbuchย โ€œยงย 311 Abs. IIโ€.ย dejure.org. Archived fromย the originalย on 2007-01-11.
  274. ^ย โ€œยงย 105โ€.ย dejure.org. Bรผrgerliches Gesetzbuch: Nichtigkeit der Willenserklรคrung.ย Archivedย from the original on 2006-12-09. Retrievedย 2006-12-05.
  275. ^ย Smith,ย The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law, 1037
  276. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Pargendler, Maria (2018).ย โ€œThe Role of the State in Contract Law: The Common-Civil Law Divideโ€ย (PDF).ย Yale Journal of International Law.ย 43ย (1): 143โ€“189.ย doi:10.2139/ssrn.2848886.ย S2CIDย 3548111. Retrievedย 2020-01-03.
  277. ^ย Blake V. (2012).ย When Is a Patient-Physician Relationship Established?ย Archivedย 2013-11-04 at theย Wayback Machine.ย Virtual Mentor.
  278. ^ย Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (New Zealand)
  279. ^ย Civil Law Act 1909 (Singapore)
  280. ^ย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book Three, Chapter Six, Article 545
  281. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Assignee Liability: Through the Minefieldย Archivedย 2016-05-17 at the Portuguese Web Archive. Arnstein & Lehr LLP.
  282. ^ย See 15 U.S.C. 1641(a).
  283. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Commercial Paper: Holder in Due Course & Defencesย Archivedย 2012-11-28 at theย Wayback Machine.
  284. ^ย FTC Opinion Letter Affirms Consumersโ€™ Rights under the Holder Ruleย Archivedย 2012-11-06 at theย Wayback Machine. FTC.
  285. ^ย Farnsworth, E. Allen (November 1970). โ€œLegal Remedies for Breach of Contractโ€.ย Columbia Law Review.ย 70ย (7): 1145โ€“1216.ย doi:10.2307/1121184.ย JSTORย 1121184.
  286. ^ย Rowan, Solรจne (2012).ย Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection of Performance. Oxford University Press.ย ISBNย 978-0199606603. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  287. ^ย Healy, James J. (2008).ย โ€œConsumer Protection Choice of Law: European Lessons for the United Statesโ€.ย Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law.ย 19: 535. Retrievedย 10 Octoberย 2017.
  288. ^ย โ€œRegulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Councilโ€.ย Eur-Lex. 2008-06-17. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  289. ^ย Choice of Court Agreements Act 2016 (Singapore), s.11
  290. ^ย Choice of Court Agreements Act 2016 (Singapore), s.12
  291. ^ย Choice of Court Agreements Act 2016 (Singapore), s.8
  292. ^ย โ€œCommercial law: Contract lawโ€.ย Monash University. Archived fromย the originalย on 2018-09-14. Retrievedย 2018-09-14.
  293. ^ย See, e.g.,ย Mullenix, Linda A. (1988).ย โ€œAnother Choice of Forum, Another Choice of Law: Consensual Adjudicatory Procedure in Federal Courtโ€.ย Fordham Law Review.ย 57: 291. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  294. ^ย Ward, A.A. (2005).ย โ€œCircumventing the Supremacy Clause โ€“ Understanding the Constitutional Implications of the United Statesโ€™ Treatment of Treaty Obligations through an Analysis of the New York Conventionโ€.ย San Diego International Law Journal.ย 7: 491. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  295. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย eย International Arbitration Act 1994 (Singapore)
  296. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย eย Arbitration Act 2001 (Singapore)
  297. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย โ€œWhy Arbitration in Intellectual Property?โ€.ย WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  298. ^ย See, e.g.,ย Edwards, Harry T. (1988).ย โ€œJudicial Review of Labor Arbitration Awards: The Clash Between the Public Policy Exception and the Duty to Bargainโ€.ย Chicago-Kent Law Review.ย 64ย (1): 4. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  299. ^ย New York Civil Procedure Law and Rules ยง 7501, et seq.
  300. ^ย โ€œUniform Arbitration Act (1956 Act or 2000 Act)โ€.ย Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrievedย 2017-10-10.
  301. ^ย Bernard, Tara S. (2014-07-18).ย โ€œTaking a Broker to Arbitrationโ€.ย The New York Times. New York Times. Retrievedย 2017-08-13.
  302. ^ย Cleaver, Joanne (2014-08-28).ย โ€œWhat Your Financial Advisorโ€™s Mandatory Arbitration Clause Means for Youโ€. U.S. News & World Report. Retrievedย 2017-08-13.
  303. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act
  304. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Report on the Right of Appeal against International Arbitration Awards on Questions of Law
  305. ^ย โ€œArbitration Act 1996, Part I, Powers of the court in relation to award, Section 69โ€.ย legislation.gov.uk.ย Archivedย from the original on Aug 13, 2022.
  306. ^ย McNair Chambers, โ€œEnglish Commercial Court Reviews Jurisdiction Clausesโ€œ, published 8 July 2014, accessed 26 June 2023.
  307. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Mediation Act 2017 (Singapore)
  308. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Singapore Convention on Mediation Act 2020 (Singapore)
  309. ^ย Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act 1959 (Singapore)
  310. ^ย Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act
  311. ^ย Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act
  312. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย โ€œConvention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil or commercial mattersโ€.ย Government of the Netherlands. Retrievedย 4 Julyย 2019.
  313. ^ย Eisenberg, M. A. (2018),ย Foundational Principles of Contract Law, chapter 36, Incomplete Contracts, Oxford Academic, accessed 4 September 2023
  314. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Electronic Transactions Act 2010 (Singapore)
  315. ^ย Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 subpart 3 (New Zealand)
  316. ^ย Linstone, Harold A. (2013-04-09).ย โ€œUnderstanding Electronic Contracts โ€“ The Indian Law of Contractโ€ย (PDF).ย Nalsar Pro. Archived fromย the originalย (PDF)ย on 2018-06-13. Retrievedย 2018-04-03.
  317. ^ย โ€œStonehill Capital Management LLC v. Bank of the West, 28 NY 3d 439 (2016)โ€.ย Google Scholar. Retrievedย 2018-04-03.
  318. ^ย โ€œWhen Email Exchanges Become Binding Contractsโ€.
  319. ^ย Rรถscheisen, Martin; Baldonado, Michelle; Chang, Kevin; Gravano, Luis; Ketchpel, Steven; Paepcke, Andreas (1998). โ€œThe Stanford InfoBus and its service layers: Augmenting the internet with higher-level information management protocolsโ€.ย Digital Libraries in Computer Science: The MeDoc Approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol.ย 1392. Springer. pp.ย 213โ€“230.ย doi:10.1007/bfb0052526.ย ISBNย 978-3-540-64493-4.
  320. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Fries, Martin; P. Paal, Boris (2019).ย Smart Contractsย (in German). Mohr Siebeck.ย ISBNย 978-3-16-156911-1.ย JSTORย j.ctvn96h9r.
  321. ^ย Savelyev, Alexander (2016-12-14). โ€œContract Law 2.0: โ€œSmartโ€ Contracts As the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Lawโ€. Social Science Research Network.ย SSRNย 2885241.ย {{cite journal}}:ย Cite journal requiresย |journal=ย (help)
  322. ^ย Tapscott, Don; Tapscott, Alex (May 2016).ย The Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Portfolio/Penguin. pp.ย 72, 83, 101, 127.ย ISBNย 978-0670069972.
  323. ^ย Szabo, Nickย (1997).ย โ€œView of Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks | First Mondayโ€.ย First Monday.ย doi:10.5210/fm.v2i9.548.ย S2CIDย 33773111. Archived fromย the originalย on 2022-04-10. Retrievedย 2022-01-22.
  324. ^ย โ€œArizona HB2417 โ€“ 2017 โ€“ Fifty-third Legislature 1st Regularโ€.ย LegiScan.
  325. ^ย Hyman Gayle M, Digesti, Matthew P.,ย New Nevada legislation recognizes blockchain and smart contract terminologiesย August 2017, Nevada Lawyer
  326. ^ย Tom, Daniel (22 September 2020).ย โ€œSmart Contract Bill Tennesseeโ€ย (PDF).
  327. ^ย Wyoming, Legislature (26 February 2019).ย โ€œWyoming โ€“ Smart Contractโ€.
  328. ^ย โ€œIowa House approves bills to facilitate broadband, cryptocurrencyโ€.ย www.thegazette.com. Retrievedย 2021-04-15.
  329. ^ย Gowling WLG,ย International transactions: Consumer contracts Q&A Canada, reproduced fromย Practical Lawย with the permission of the publishers, accessed on 20 December 2024
  330. ^ย Caรฑizares Laso, Ana; Algaba Ros, Silvia (2006).ย Clรกusulas abusivas en la contrataciรณn inmobiliaria. Tecnos.ย ISBNย 8430943587. Retrievedย 2017-01-28.
  331. ^ย Las 7 clรกusulas abusivas mรกs frecuentes en una hipoteca: efectos y consecuencias
  332. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Leyva, Jeanette (2015-06-18).ย โ€œCondusef detecta 185 clรกusulas abusivas en contratos de instituciones financierasโ€. elfinanciero.com.mx. Retrievedย 2017-01-27.
  333. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย dย Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
  334. ^ย Milland, Kristy (2020-06-29).ย โ€œUber v Heller Affirms Two-Step Unconscionability Testโ€. Retrievedย 2022-10-14.
  335. ^ย Carlos A., Ghersi; Celia, Weingarten (2017). โ€œRรฉgimen general de los contratos y las relaciones de consumoโ€.ย Manual de contratos civiles, comerciales y de consumo. La Ley. p.ย 513.ย ISBNย 978-987-03-3194-0.
  336. ^ย โ€œCCCN art. 1119โ€. Archived fromย the originalย on 2019-02-23. Retrievedย 2018-06-10.
  337. ^ย LDC art. 37
  338. ^ย El Supremo arruina el multimillonario negocio de la reclamaciรณn de gastos hipotecarios, 1 March 2018, Pรบblico (Espaรฑa)
  339. ^ย Statutory Instrumentย 2001 No. 1186
  340. ^ย Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1972 (Singapore)
  341. ^ย Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971ย (UK)
  342. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Multimodal Transport Act 2021 (Singapore)
  343. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Civil Code of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China, Book Three, Chapter Nine, Section Four
  344. ^ย CCPRC Chapter XIX
  345. ^ย Marine Insurance Act 1909 (Singapore)
  346. ^ย Marine Insurance Act 1906ย (UK)
  347. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย General Services Administration,ย Federal Acquisition Regulation: Part 16 โ€“ Types of Contracts, accessed 4 September 2023
  348. ^ย Federal Acquisition Institute,ย Knowledge Nugget: Contract Types Transcript, accessed 4 September 2023
  349. ^ย Haapio, H., Berger-Walliser, G., Walliser, B. and Rekola, K.,ย Time for a Visual Turn in Contracting?,ย Journal of Contract Management, Summer 2012, pp. 49-57
  350. ^ย Keating, A. and Andersen, C. B.,ย A graphic contract: Taking visualisation in contracting a step further,ย Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 2016, Vol. 2 (1-2), pp. 10โ€“18,ย doi:10.1177/205556361667237, accessed 1 December 2023
  351. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย Responsible Contracting Project,ย The Mission, accessed 9 November 2023
  352. ^ย Cabinet Office,ย Guidance on responsible contractual behaviour in the performance and enforcement of contracts impacted by the Covid-19 emergencyย published 7 May 2020, accessed 30 September 2023
  353. ^ย Competition and Markets Authority,ย How to write fair contracts: information for businesses, published 23 March 2016, accessed 9 November 2023
  354. ^ย Sale, A. U.,ย Replacing the Care Services Improvement Partnership, published 24 November 2008, accessed 30 September 2023
  355. ^ย Social Care Institute for Excellence,ย A guide to fairer contracting: part 1, published 2005, accessed 30 September 2023
  356. ^ย Jump up to:aย bย cย Clogg, D.,ย The importance of well worded contracts in commissioning,ย Care Services Improvement Partnership, accessed 30 September 2023
  357. ^ย Social Care Institute for Excellence,ย A guide to fairer contracting, part 2: service specifications, published 2007, accessed 9 November 2023
  358. ^ย Social Care Wales,ย National Occupational Standards: Commissioning, Procurement and Contracting, updated 16 June 2023, accessed 9 November 2023
  359. ^ย HM Government,ย The Construction Playbook, Version 1.1, September 2022, accessed 9 November 2023
Tags: , , , , , , ,