Nature Inventory valuation- Nature inventory valuation refers to the process of assessing the economic value of natural resources and ecosystems. This valuation is essential for decision-making in environmental management, conservation, and sustainable development. Here are some key aspects:

1. Types of Values

• Direct Use Value: Economic benefits derived directly from nature, such as timber, fisheries, and recreational activities.
• Indirect Use Value: Benefits obtained from ecosystem services, like water purification, climate regulation, and pollination.
• Option Value: The value of preserving natural resources for future use.
• Existence Value: The intrinsic value of biodiversity and ecosystems, even if they are not directly used.

2. Methods of Valuation

• Market Pricing: Using market prices for goods and services to estimate value.
• Contingent Valuation: Surveys to determine how much people would be willing to pay for specific environmental benefits.
• Travel Cost Method: Estimating the value of recreational sites based on travel expenses incurred by visitors.
• Hedonic Pricing: Analyzing how environmental features impact property values.

3. Application in Policy and Planning

• Helps in making informed decisions regarding land use, conservation, and resource management.
• Supports the integration of ecological values into economic frameworks and policy decisions.
• Assists in measuring the impact of environmental changes on economies.

4. Challenges

• Difficulty in quantifying non-market values.
• Variability in cultural and personal values regarding nature.
• The need for comprehensive data and methodologies.

5. Importance

• Promotes sustainable practices by highlighting the economic benefits of preserving natural ecosystems.
• Aids in attracting funding and support for conservation initiatives.
• Enhances public awareness of the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Understanding nature inventory valuation is crucial for balancing economic development with environmental sustainability.

What is Required Nature Inventory valuation

Required Nature Inventory Valuation typically refers to the necessary assessments and evaluations needed to quantify the value of natural resources and ecosystem services in a specific area. This process is essential for informed decision-making in environmental policy, conservation, and land management. Here are the key components involved in conducting a required nature inventory valuation:

1. Defining Objectives

• Purpose: Determine the reasons for conducting the valuation (e.g., policy formulation, resource management, conservation planning).
• Scope: Identify the specific ecosystems, resources, or services to be valued.

2. Inventory of Natural Resources

• Data Collection: Gather data on the quantity, quality, and distribution of natural resources (flora, fauna, water bodies, minerals, etc.).
• Biodiversity Assessment: Evaluate species richness and ecosystem health.

3. Assessment of Ecosystem Services

• Classification: Identify and categorize ecosystem services (provisioning, regulating, supporting, and cultural services).
• Service Mapping: Create maps to visualize the distribution of ecosystem services.

4. Valuation Methods

• Selection of Methods: Choose appropriate valuation techniques based on the services being assessed, available data, and stakeholder preferences. Common methods include:
  • Market Pricing
  • Contingent Valuation
  • Travel Cost Method
  • Hedonic Pricing
• Economic Analysis: Quantify the value of ecosystem services in monetary terms where applicable.

5. Stakeholder Engagement

• Consultation: Engage with local communities, businesses, and stakeholders to gather input and insights on the value of natural resources and services.
• Collaboration: Work with environmental experts, economists, and local authorities to ensure comprehensive and accurate assessments.

6. Regulatory and Policy Framework

• Compliance: Ensure that the valuation process adheres to relevant environmental laws and regulations.
• Integration into Policy: Use the valuation results to inform policy decisions, land use planning, and conservation strategies.

7. Reporting and Communication

• Documentation: Prepare reports detailing the methods used, findings, and implications of the valuation.
• Public Awareness: Share results with stakeholders and the public to raise awareness of the importance of natural resources and ecosystem services.

8. Monitoring and Updating

• Continuous Assessment: Establish a framework for ongoing monitoring of natural resources and ecosystem services to adapt to changes over time.
• Regular Updates: Re-evaluate valuations periodically to reflect new data, changes in environmental conditions, or shifts in societal values.

Importance of Required Nature Inventory Valuation

• Sustainable Management: Aids in making informed decisions that promote the sustainable use of natural resources.
• Economic Justification: Provides a financial rationale for conservation efforts and sustainable practices.
• Ecosystem Protection: Highlights the significance of protecting biodiversity and ecosystem health for future generations.

By conducting a required nature inventory valuation, stakeholders can better understand the value of nature, making it easier to justify investments in conservation and sustainable resource management.

Who is Required Nature Inventory valuation

The term Required Nature Inventory Valuation generally refers to the systematic process of evaluating and assigning economic value to natural resources and ecosystem services. However, the phrase can also imply the various stakeholders and entities involved in conducting such valuations. Here’s a breakdown of who might be involved in this process:

1. Government Agencies

• Environmental Protection Agencies: Responsible for regulating and protecting natural resources and ecosystems.
• Land Use and Planning Authorities: Involved in assessing land use impacts and making decisions that affect natural resources.

2. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)

• Conservation Groups: Focus on protecting biodiversity and advocating for sustainable practices.
• Environmental Advocacy Organizations: Work on raising awareness about the importance of ecosystem services.

3. Researchers and Academics

• Ecologists and Environmental Scientists: Conduct research on ecosystems and biodiversity, providing the scientific basis for valuations.
• Economists: Specialize in valuation techniques and economic analyses related to natural resources and ecosystem services.

4. Consultants and Professionals

• Environmental Consultants: Provide expertise in conducting valuations, offering services to businesses and governments.
• Sustainability Experts: Advise on integrating nature inventory valuations into corporate sustainability strategies.

5. Local Communities

• Indigenous Peoples: Often hold traditional ecological knowledge that can provide valuable insights into the value of local ecosystems.
• Community Stakeholders: Residents and local organizations that may depend on natural resources for their livelihoods.

6. Businesses and Corporations

• Industry Stakeholders: Companies that rely on natural resources (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fishing) may conduct valuations to assess the sustainability of their practices.
• Corporate Sustainability Departments: Work to incorporate nature inventory valuations into corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives.

7. International Organizations

• UN Agencies (e.g., UN Environment Programme): Facilitate global discussions and provide guidelines on the valuation of ecosystems and natural resources.
• Development Banks: May include nature valuation in their investment assessments for projects affecting natural resources.

Importance of Collaboration

The process of required nature inventory valuation often involves collaboration among these various stakeholders to ensure comprehensive assessments that consider ecological, economic, and social perspectives. Engaging multiple stakeholders can also enhance the legitimacy and acceptance of the valuation results.

When is Required Nature Inventory valuation

Required Nature Inventory Valuation can take place at various times and stages within environmental management, policy development, and project planning. Here are some key instances when such valuations are typically required:

1. Project Planning and Development

• Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): Conducted before initiating projects that may affect natural resources or ecosystems (e.g., infrastructure development, mining, and agriculture). Valuation helps assess potential ecological impacts and informs mitigation strategies.
• Land Use Planning: Valuation is crucial when developing land use plans to balance economic development with environmental protection.

2. Policy Formulation

• Legislative Initiatives: When governments develop new environmental policies or regulations, valuations help quantify the benefits of natural resources and ecosystem services.
• Conservation Strategies: During the formulation of conservation policies, valuations provide a basis for prioritizing conservation areas and actions.

3. Resource Management

• Sustainable Management Practices: Valuations are required to guide the sustainable use of natural resources, such as forestry, fisheries, and water resources, ensuring that economic activities do not deplete ecosystems.
• Biodiversity Management: Valuation is necessary for strategies aimed at preserving biodiversity and assessing the benefits of biodiversity conservation.

4. Funding and Investment

• Project Proposals: When seeking funding for conservation projects, nature inventory valuations provide economic justifications for investments in natural resource management and restoration.
• Public-Private Partnerships: Valuation can support collaboration between public entities and private businesses to promote sustainable practices and investments.

5. Monitoring and Reporting

• Environmental Reporting: Regular valuations may be required for corporate sustainability reports or governmental environmental assessments to track changes in ecosystem services and natural capital.
• Assessment of Ecosystem Health: Valuation helps in assessing the ongoing health of ecosystems and can guide adaptive management practices.

6. Public Awareness and Education

• Community Engagement Initiatives: Valuations can be conducted to inform and engage local communities about the value of their natural resources and ecosystems, fostering stewardship and sustainable practices.

7. Regulatory Compliance

• Environmental Regulations: Organizations may be required to conduct valuations as part of compliance with environmental regulations that mandate the assessment of impacts on natural resources.

Timing Considerations

The timing of required nature inventory valuation can vary based on local regulations, specific project timelines, and the urgency of environmental issues. It is often best conducted as early as possible in project planning or policy development to ensure that ecological considerations are integrated from the outset.

Where is Required Nature Inventory valuation

Required Nature Inventory Valuation can be conducted in various geographical and ecological contexts, depending on the specific ecosystems and resources being assessed. Here are some key locations and contexts where such valuations typically occur:

1. Protected Areas and Conservation Sites

• National Parks and Wildlife Reserves: Valuations are conducted to assess the economic value of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and recreational opportunities in protected areas.
• Conservation Easements: Areas set aside for conservation may require valuations to justify protection efforts and guide management decisions.

2. Urban Environments

• City Parks and Green Spaces: Urban nature inventory valuations assess the benefits of parks and green roofs, including air quality improvement, recreation, and heat mitigation.
• Infrastructure Projects: Valuations help assess the impact of urban development on natural resources and ecosystem services.

3. Agricultural Lands

• Farmlands: Valuations can be conducted to evaluate ecosystem services provided by agricultural landscapes, such as soil health, water regulation, and biodiversity support.
• Sustainable Farming Initiatives: Assessing the economic benefits of ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture practices.

4. Coastal and Marine Areas

• Coastal Ecosystems: Valuations are essential for assessing the economic contributions of mangroves, coral reefs, and wetlands in coastal regions, including fisheries and tourism.
• Marine Protected Areas: Evaluating the ecosystem services provided by marine environments and their economic value.

5. Forested Regions

• Forestry Management: Valuations in forested areas assess timber resources, carbon sequestration, and recreational opportunities, guiding sustainable forestry practices.
• Deforestation Impact Assessments: Evaluating the economic loss from deforestation and its impacts on local communities and ecosystems.

6. Rural Areas

• Natural Resource Extraction Sites: Areas involved in mining, oil extraction, or other resource extraction activities require valuations to assess the impact on local ecosystems and communities.
• Land Use Changes: Assessing the economic implications of land use changes in rural settings, such as conversion of forests to agriculture.

7. Global and Regional Assessments

• International Projects: Valuations are often conducted as part of global assessments (e.g., the United Nations’ Ecosystem Services Valuation) to understand the economic significance of biodiversity and ecosystem services worldwide.
• Regional Studies: Valuations can be conducted at a regional level to inform specific environmental policies or conservation strategies.

8. Indigenous and Local Community Lands

• Traditional Territories: Valuations may be required in indigenous lands to assess the economic importance of natural resources and ecosystem services, often integrating traditional ecological knowledge.
• Community-Led Conservation: Local communities may conduct valuations to advocate for the protection of their natural resources and ecosystems.

Conclusion

The location for required nature inventory valuation can range from local and community-based assessments to national and international evaluations, depending on the scale of the project and the specific natural resources being valued. Each context may present unique challenges and opportunities for effective valuation.

How is Required Nature Inventory valuation

Required Nature Inventory Valuation is a systematic process that involves several key steps and methodologies to assess the economic value of natural resources and ecosystem services. Here’s an overview of how this valuation is typically conducted:

1. Define Objectives and Scope

• Identify Goals: Clearly define the purpose of the valuation (e.g., policy-making, project planning, conservation).
• Determine Scope: Decide which ecosystems, resources, and services will be included in the assessment.

2. Conduct an Inventory of Natural Resources

• Data Collection: Gather existing data on the quantity, quality, and distribution of natural resources (e.g., flora, fauna, water bodies).
• Field Surveys: Conduct on-site surveys and assessments to collect primary data on biodiversity and ecosystem health.

3. Assess Ecosystem Services

• Classification: Identify and categorize ecosystem services provided by the natural resources, such as:
  • Provisioning Services: Food, water, raw materials.
  • Regulating Services: Climate regulation, flood control, disease regulation.
  • Cultural Services: Recreational, aesthetic, spiritual benefits.
  • Supporting Services: Soil formation, nutrient cycling, habitat provision.
• Mapping: Create spatial maps to visualize the distribution of ecosystem services and their benefits.

4. Choose Valuation Methods

• Select Appropriate Methods: Depending on the nature of the services being assessed, choose suitable valuation techniques, such as:
  • Market Pricing: Use market values for goods and services derived from natural resources.
  • Contingent Valuation: Conduct surveys to assess how much people are willing to pay for ecosystem services.
  • Travel Cost Method: Estimate the value of recreational sites based on visitor spending and travel costs.
  • Hedonic Pricing: Analyze how environmental features impact property values.

5. Conduct Economic Analysis

• Quantification: Calculate the monetary value of the identified ecosystem services using the selected methods.
• Sensitivity Analysis: Assess the robustness of the valuation results by considering various scenarios and assumptions.

6. Engage Stakeholders

• Consultation: Involve local communities, businesses, and relevant stakeholders in the valuation process to gather insights and validate findings.
• Collaboration: Work with interdisciplinary teams, including ecologists, economists, and social scientists, to ensure comprehensive assessments.

7. Report Findings

• Documentation: Prepare detailed reports outlining the valuation methods used, findings, and implications for decision-making.
• Visualization: Use charts, graphs, and maps to effectively communicate results to stakeholders.

8. Integrate into Policy and Planning

• Policy Recommendations: Use the valuation results to inform and guide policy decisions, land use planning, and conservation strategies.
• Management Practices: Assist in developing sustainable management practices based on the economic value of ecosystem services.

9. Monitor and Update

• Continuous Assessment: Establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring of ecosystem health and resource availability.
• Periodic Updates: Re-evaluate valuations to reflect changes in environmental conditions, societal values, or new data.

Importance of Required Nature Inventory Valuation

• Informs Decision-Making: Provides critical information for policymakers and resource managers to make informed choices about land use and conservation.
• Justifies Investments: Supports funding and investment decisions by highlighting the economic benefits of preserving natural ecosystems.
• Promotes Sustainable Practices: Encourages the adoption of sustainable practices that recognize the intrinsic value of nature.

This structured approach ensures that the required nature inventory valuation is comprehensive, scientifically sound, and relevant to the specific context of the assessment.

Case Study on Nature Inventory valuation

Here’s a case study on Nature Inventory Valuation that highlights the process, methods, and outcomes of assessing the economic value of ecosystem services in a specific context.

The Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Chesapeake Bay

Background

Chesapeake Bay, located on the east coast of the United States, is one of the largest estuaries in North America. It supports a rich diversity of wildlife, fisheries, and recreational opportunities but has faced significant environmental challenges due to pollution, habitat loss, and overfishing.

Objectives

The primary objectives of this case study were to:

• Assess the economic value of the ecosystem services provided by the Chesapeake Bay.
• Inform policy decisions regarding restoration and conservation efforts.
• Engage stakeholders in the valuation process to foster support for environmental initiatives.

Methodology

1. Inventory of Natural Resources:
   • Data was collected on the bay’s natural resources, including fish populations, wetlands, and habitats for birds and other wildlife.
   • Field surveys and remote sensing techniques were employed to gather comprehensive data.
2. Assessment of Ecosystem Services:
   • The study identified various ecosystem services, such as:
     • Provisioning Services: Seafood, water supply.
     • Regulating Services: Water filtration, flood control, climate regulation.
     • Cultural Services: Recreational fishing, boating, tourism.
   • Mapping techniques were used to visualize the distribution of these services across the bay.
3. Valuation Methods:
   • Market Pricing: The study estimated the market value of seafood harvested from the bay.
   • Contingent Valuation: Surveys were conducted to determine how much people were willing to pay for improvements in water quality and recreational opportunities.
   • Travel Cost Method: The value of recreational services was assessed based on visitor spending and travel costs to the bay.
4. Stakeholder Engagement:
   • Local communities, fishermen, environmental organizations, and policymakers were engaged throughout the process to ensure their perspectives were considered.
   • Workshops and focus groups facilitated discussions on the findings and implications of the valuation.

Findings

• The total economic value of the ecosystem services provided by the Chesapeake Bay was estimated to be approximately $130 billion per year.
• Key findings included:
  • Recreational Activities: Fishing and boating contributed significantly to local economies, with recreational fishing alone generating around $1 billion annually.
  • Water Quality Improvement: Investments in wetland restoration and water quality initiatives were shown to provide substantial cost savings in water treatment.
  • Biodiversity Conservation: The protection of habitat areas for wildlife was recognized as crucial for maintaining the bay’s ecological health.

Policy Implications

The findings of this valuation study had several significant implications:

• Informed Decision-Making: Policymakers were better equipped to make informed decisions regarding resource management and environmental restoration efforts.
• Funding Support: The economic valuation provided a compelling argument for securing funding from government and private sources for restoration projects.
• Stakeholder Collaboration: Engaging stakeholders fostered a sense of ownership and support for conservation initiatives, leading to collaborative efforts among various groups.

Conclusion

The nature inventory valuation of the Chesapeake Bay demonstrated the importance of quantifying ecosystem services to inform environmental management and policy. By recognizing the economic value of these services, stakeholders were more inclined to support initiatives aimed at restoring and protecting the bay’s ecosystems.

This case study highlights the critical role that nature inventory valuation plays in sustainable resource management and conservation efforts.

White paper on Nature Inventory valuation

Here’s a structured outline for a White Paper on Nature Inventory Valuation that can serve as a comprehensive guide on the topic.

---

Executive Summary

This white paper explores the concept of nature inventory valuation, its significance in sustainable development, and methodologies for assessing the economic value of ecosystem services. It highlights the benefits of incorporating ecological values into decision-making processes to promote environmental sustainability and informed resource management.

Introduction

• Definition of Nature Inventory Valuation: Understanding the process of assessing the economic value of natural resources and ecosystem services.
• Importance of Ecosystem Services: Overview of the critical role ecosystems play in supporting human well-being and economic activities.
• Objectives of the White Paper: To provide insights into methodologies, case studies, and recommendations for integrating nature inventory valuation into policy and management.

Background

• Ecosystem Services Framework: Explanation of the various categories of ecosystem services, including:
  • Provisioning Services (e.g., food, water)
  • Regulating Services (e.g., climate regulation, flood control)
  • Cultural Services (e.g., recreation, aesthetic value)
  • Supporting Services (e.g., nutrient cycling)
• Drivers of Valuation: Discuss factors prompting the need for nature inventory valuation, such as biodiversity loss, climate change, and sustainable development goals (SDGs).

Methodologies for Nature Inventory Valuation

• Inventory and Data Collection:
  • Techniques for gathering data on natural resources, including remote sensing, field surveys, and existing databases.
• Valuation Approaches:
  • Market Pricing: Assessing the value of ecosystem services based on market transactions.
  • Contingent Valuation: Surveys to estimate people’s willingness to pay for ecosystem services.
  • Travel Cost Method: Valuing recreational services based on travel expenses incurred by visitors.
  • Hedonic Pricing: Analyzing property values to infer the economic value of ecosystem attributes.
• Integration of Indigenous Knowledge: Incorporating traditional ecological knowledge in valuation practices to enhance accuracy and cultural relevance.

Case Studies

1. Chesapeake Bay:
   • Overview of the valuation process and findings in the Chesapeake Bay, highlighting its economic contributions from fishing, tourism, and ecosystem services.
2. Costa Rica:
   • Examination of payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs that incentivize landowners to conserve forests and restore ecosystems.
3. Wetlands in the Mississippi River Delta:
   • Valuation of wetlands for flood protection, water purification, and habitat support, emphasizing their role in disaster resilience.

Benefits of Nature Inventory Valuation

• Informed Decision-Making: Valuation provides critical data for policymakers to make sustainable choices regarding land use, conservation, and resource management.
• Economic Justification for Conservation: Demonstrating the economic value of ecosystem services can enhance support for conservation initiatives.
• Enhanced Public Awareness: Educating stakeholders about the economic benefits of nature fosters a greater appreciation for ecosystems and drives community engagement.

Challenges and Limitations

• Data Gaps: Addressing the lack of comprehensive data on ecosystem services and biodiversity.
• Valuation Complexity: The difficulty in quantifying certain ecosystem services and the potential for uncertainty in valuation results.
• Integration into Policy: Overcoming barriers to incorporating valuation findings into existing policies and frameworks.

Recommendations

• Promote Collaborative Approaches: Encourage partnerships between governments, NGOs, and local communities to enhance data collection and valuation efforts.
• Support Research and Development: Invest in research to improve valuation methodologies and fill data gaps.
• Integrate Valuation into Education: Incorporate ecosystem service valuation into academic curricula to raise awareness among future decision-makers.

Conclusion

Nature inventory valuation is a critical tool for understanding the economic significance of ecosystems and their services. By integrating these values into decision-making processes, societies can promote sustainable development, protect biodiversity, and ensure the long-term health of natural resources.

References

• A comprehensive list of academic papers, reports, and other relevant resources related to nature inventory valuation.

Industrial Application of Nature Inventory valuation

The industrial application of nature inventory valuation is essential for integrating ecological considerations into business practices and decision-making processes. Here are several key areas where nature inventory valuation can be applied in an industrial context:

1. Natural Resource Management

• Sustainable Resource Extraction: Industries such as mining, forestry, and agriculture can utilize nature inventory valuation to assess the economic impact of resource extraction on ecosystems. This includes evaluating the long-term benefits of sustainable practices against short-term profits.
• Ecosystem Service Assessment: Industries can assess how their operations affect ecosystem services, such as water purification, carbon sequestration, and soil fertility. Understanding these services can lead to better management practices that reduce environmental impact.

2. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

• Environmental Reporting: Companies are increasingly required to report on their environmental impact. Nature inventory valuation provides a framework for quantifying the ecological costs and benefits associated with their operations, enhancing transparency and accountability.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Valuing ecosystem services can help companies communicate their sustainability efforts to stakeholders, including investors, customers, and regulatory bodies. This engagement fosters trust and supports brand reputation.

3. Ecosystem-Based Management in Industries

• Water Resource Management: Industries that rely on freshwater resources (e.g., agriculture, manufacturing) can conduct nature inventory valuations to evaluate the impact of their water usage on local ecosystems and communities. This can lead to more sustainable water management practices.
• Biodiversity Conservation: Companies can assess the biodiversity impacts of their operations and develop strategies to mitigate adverse effects, such as habitat destruction or pollution. This approach helps preserve ecosystems while maintaining operational efficiency.

4. Supply Chain Management

• Sustainable Sourcing: Industries can incorporate nature inventory valuation into their supply chain decisions to prioritize sourcing from suppliers that practice sustainable land use and resource management. This promotes a circular economy and reduces environmental impact.
• Lifecycle Assessment: Valuing ecosystem services at different stages of the product lifecycle helps identify opportunities for reducing environmental footprints, improving product design, and enhancing resource efficiency.

5. Regulatory Compliance and Risk Management

• Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs): Nature inventory valuation can be integrated into EIAs required by regulatory authorities. This integration ensures that companies consider the economic value of ecosystem services when evaluating potential project impacts.
• Risk Mitigation: By understanding the economic implications of ecosystem degradation, companies can proactively manage risks associated with resource scarcity, regulatory changes, and reputational damage.

6. Investment and Financial Decision-Making

• Valuation for Investment Decisions: Investors are increasingly considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in their investment decisions. Nature inventory valuation provides insights into the potential financial risks and opportunities associated with ecological health.
• Green Financing: Companies can use ecosystem service valuations to support applications for green financing, enabling them to invest in sustainable practices and technologies.

7. Product Development and Innovation

• Eco-Innovation: Companies can leverage nature inventory valuation to drive eco-innovation, developing products and services that enhance or restore ecosystem services. This can create new market opportunities and address consumer demand for sustainable products.
• Ecosystem Service Pricing: By understanding the value of ecosystem services, companies can develop pricing strategies that reflect the true cost of resource use, encouraging more responsible consumption and production patterns.

8. Collaboration and Partnerships

• Public-Private Partnerships: Industries can collaborate with governmental and non-governmental organizations to fund and implement nature inventory valuation projects. Such partnerships can enhance conservation efforts and improve community relations.
• Ecosystem Restoration Projects: Companies can invest in or support ecosystem restoration initiatives that provide tangible benefits to local communities and ecosystems while enhancing their corporate image.

Conclusion

The industrial application of nature inventory valuation is increasingly recognized as a vital component of sustainable business practices. By valuing ecosystem services, industries can make informed decisions that balance economic growth with environmental stewardship, ultimately leading to more resilient ecosystems and sustainable communities. Embracing nature inventory valuation not only benefits businesses but also contributes to the overall health of the planet.

1. Pollution / quality
2. Ambient standards (US)
3. Index
4. Indoor
5. Law Clean Air Act (US)
6. Ozone depletion
7. Airshed
8. Trading
9. Deforestation (REDD)
10. Bio
11. Law
12. Resources
13. Fossil fuels (gas, peak coal, peak gas, peak oil)
14. Geothermal
15. Hydro
16. Nuclear
17. Solar sunlight
18. shade
19. Wind
20. Agricultural arable peak farmland
21. Degradation
22. Field
23. Landscape cityscape
24. seascape
25. soundscape
26. viewshed
27. Law property
28. Management habitat conservation
29. Minerals gemstone
30. industrial
31. ore metal
32. mining law
33. sand
34. peak copper
35. phosphorus
36. rights
37. Soil conservation
38. fertility
39. health
40. resilience
41. Use planning
42. reserve
43. Biodiversity
44. Bioprospecting biopiracy
45. Biosphere
46. Bushfood
47. Bushmeat
48. Fisheries climate change
49. law
50. management
51. Forests genetic resources
52. law
53. management
54. non-timber products
55. Game law
56. Marine conservation
57. Meadow
58. Pasture
59. Plants FAO Plant Treaty
60. food
61. genetic resources
62. gene banks
63. herbal medicines
64. UPOV Convention
65. wood
66. Rangeland
67. Seed bank
68. Wildlife conservation
69. management
70. Commons enclosure
71. global
72. land
73. tragedy of
74. Economics ecological
75. land
76. Ecosystem services
77. Exploitation overexploitation
78. Earth Overshoot Day
79. Management adaptive
80. Natural capital accounting
81. good
82. Natural heritage
83. Nature reserve remnant natural area
84. Systems ecology
85. Urban ecology
86. Wilderness
87. Aquifer storage and recovery
88. Drinking
89. Fresh
90. Groundwater pollution
91. recharge
92. remediation
93. Hydrosphere
94. Ice bergs
95. glacial
96. polar
97. Irrigation huerta
98. Marine
99. Rain harvesting
100. Stormwater
101. Surface water
102. Sewage reclaimed water
103. Watershed
104. Desalination
105. Floods
106. Law
107. Leaching
108. Sanitation improved
109. Scarcity
110. Security
111. Supply
112. Efficiency
113. Conflict
114. Conservation
115. Peak water
116. Pollution
117. Privatization
118. Quality
119. Right
120. Resources improved