You are currently viewing The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976- The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, is an Indian labor law aimed at regulating employment conditions in industrial establishments. It requires employers to formally define and communicate the terms and conditions of employment to their workers.

Key Features of the Act:

  1. Applicability:
    • Applicable to industrial establishments employing 100 or more workers (as per amendments, this threshold may vary by state).
    • Industrial establishments include factories, mines, railways, and other workplaces defined under the Act.
  2. Standing Orders:
    • Employers are required to draft and submit “Standing Orders” to the Certifying Officer.
    • These Standing Orders outline terms of employment, including working hours, shifts, leave policies, disciplinary actions, and grievance mechanisms.
  3. Certification:
    • Standing Orders must be certified by the Certifying Officer after ensuring compliance with the Act and consultation with employees.
    • Once certified, these orders are binding on both employers and employees.
  4. Content of Standing Orders:
    • They typically include rules on:
      • Classification of workers (e.g., permanent, temporary, apprentices).
      • Work hours and shifts.
      • Leave and holidays.
      • Termination and disciplinary procedures.
      • Grievance redressal mechanisms.
  5. Model Standing Orders:
    • The Central Government has prescribed “Model Standing Orders,” which serve as a guideline for employers.
    • If an establishment fails to draft its own Standing Orders, the Model Standing Orders are deemed applicable.
  6. Role of Trade Unions:
    • Trade unions and workers’ representatives play a key role in ensuring that the Standing Orders are fair and inclusive.
  7. Penalties for Non-Compliance:
    • Employers failing to submit or implement Standing Orders may face penalties, including fines.
  8. Amendments and Updates:
    • The Act has been amended over time to align with evolving labor laws and industry practices. Some states in India may have their own rules and thresholds under the Act.

This law promotes transparency and fairness in employment practices, reducing misunderstandings and disputes between employers and workers.

What is Required The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

However, if you’re asking about the requirements or provisions under the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, here is a detailed overview:

Requirements under the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

  1. Applicability:
    • The Act applies to all industrial establishments where 100 or more workers are employed (the threshold may vary based on state amendments).
    • It covers factories, railways, mines, and other industrial establishments as defined under the Act.
  2. Drafting of Standing Orders:
    • Employers must prepare draft Standing Orders that clearly define the terms and conditions of employment.
    • These must be submitted to the Certifying Officer (generally the Labor Commissioner or other authorized officer).
  3. Submission Process:
    • Employers are required to submit the draft Standing Orders within 6 months of the establishment falling under the Act’s purview.
    • The draft must adhere to the provisions of the Act and should not violate any labor laws.
  4. Contents of Standing Orders:
    • The Standing Orders must cover the following aspects:
      • Classification of workers: Permanent, temporary, apprentices, probationers, etc.
      • Working hours, shifts, and attendance: Specifying work schedules, overtime, and leave policies.
      • Leave and holidays: Provisions for annual leave, sick leave, and other types of leave.
      • Conditions of employment: Policies on hiring, probation, and termination of services.
      • Disciplinary procedures: Rules for addressing misconduct, suspensions, and penalties.
      • Grievance redressal mechanisms: Systems to handle employee complaints and disputes.
  5. Certification of Standing Orders:
    • The Certifying Officer reviews the submitted Standing Orders to ensure compliance with the Act.
    • Before certification, the officer consults with employee representatives or trade unions.
    • Once certified, these Standing Orders become binding on both the employer and employees.
  6. Implementation of Model Standing Orders:
    • If an employer fails to submit Standing Orders, the Model Standing Orders prescribed by the government automatically apply.
  7. Posting and Communication:
    • Certified Standing Orders must be prominently displayed at the workplace in a language understood by the majority of workers.
  8. Modifications to Standing Orders:
    • Employers or employees can request modifications to the certified Standing Orders.
    • Any modifications require approval from the Certifying Officer and consultation with both parties.
  9. Penalty for Non-Compliance:
    • Failure to comply with the Act, such as not submitting Standing Orders or violating certified provisions, can result in fines or other penalties.
  10. Employee Rights:
    • Workers are entitled to be treated in accordance with the certified Standing Orders.
    • The Act ensures that employees have a clear understanding of their rights and responsibilities.

Who is Required The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

The Employment Standing Order Act 1976 1

If you’re asking who is required to comply with the provisions of this Act, here’s a detailed explanation:

Who is Required to Follow the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946?

  1. Employers:
    • Industrial Establishments employing 100 or more workers (the threshold may vary by state amendments) are required to comply.
    • This includes establishments like:
      • Factories.
      • Railways.
      • Mines.
      • Workshops.
      • Other industries as specified by the Act or notified by the government.
  2. Workers:
    • The Act applies to all workers employed in the industrial establishment. This includes:
      • Permanent employees.
      • Temporary employees.
      • Apprentices.
      • Probationers.
    • Workers must follow the certified Standing Orders, which outline their rights, responsibilities, and workplace rules.
  3. Trade Unions and Employee Representatives:
    • Trade unions or worker representatives play a role in reviewing and approving the Standing Orders.
    • They are consulted during the certification or modification process to ensure the Standing Orders are fair and in the interest of workers.
  4. Certifying Officer:
    • A government-appointed Certifying Officer (such as the Labor Commissioner) is required to:
      • Review and certify the submitted draft Standing Orders.
      • Ensure that the terms are consistent with the law and fair to workers.
      • Address disputes related to the Standing Orders.
  5. Government Authorities:
    • The government is responsible for:
      • Notifying the Model Standing Orders that act as a default framework.
      • Supervising compliance and addressing violations.

Industries/Establishments Excluded:

While the Act is broad in scope, some establishments may not fall under its purview, such as:

  • Smaller establishments with fewer than 100 workers (unless state amendments reduce the threshold).
  • Non-industrial establishments or service-oriented sectors (e.g., IT companies, retail shops) unless specifically notified by the government.

If you are asking about who within an organization must handle compliance, it is typically the responsibility of:

  • Human Resources (HR) departments for drafting and implementing Standing Orders.
  • Legal teams to ensure compliance with the Act.

When is Required The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

It seems like you’re asking when the requirements of the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (not 1976) are applicable. Here’s a breakdown of when this law is required or comes into force:

When is the Employment (Standing Orders) Act Required?

  1. Applicability Based on Workforce Size:
    • The Act applies when an industrial establishment employs 100 or more workers (though some states have amended this threshold to as low as 50 workers).
    • Once an establishment reaches the specified workforce size, it must comply with the provisions of the Act.
  2. Timing for Submitting Standing Orders:
    • Employers are required to submit draft Standing Orders to the Certifying Officer within 6 months of the establishment coming under the Act’s purview (e.g., reaching the minimum number of employees).
  3. When a New Establishment is Set Up:
    • A newly established industrial unit with the requisite number of employees must comply with the Act by drafting, submitting, and implementing Standing Orders.
  4. When Changes Are Made to Employment Policies:
    • If there are significant changes in employment policies, rules, or conditions, the employer may need to amend the certified Standing Orders.
    • Amendments must be approved by the Certifying Officer and, if applicable, by consulting employees or trade unions.
  5. During Employment Disputes or Misconduct Cases:
    • The Standing Orders become critical when handling worker grievances, disciplinary actions, or disputes, as they define the rules for such procedures.
    • Non-compliance during disputes can lead to penalties or legal challenges.
  6. When Requested by Employees or Trade Unions:
    • Workers or trade unions may request the enforcement of specific provisions under the Standing Orders.
    • This typically happens if the employer has failed to draft or implement Standing Orders or if existing rules are unfair or unclear.
  7. Default Application of Model Standing Orders:
    • If the employer does not submit Standing Orders within the required time, the government-prescribed Model Standing Orders automatically apply.

Key Events That Trigger the Act:

  • Crossing the workforce threshold (e.g., 100 or more employees, or the state-specific number).
  • Setting up a new industrial establishment.
  • Expanding an existing establishment to meet the applicability criteria.
  • Employee grievances or disputes over unclear employment terms.

Where is Required The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (not 1976) specifies where it is applicable. Here’s an overview of where the Act is required or enforced:

Where is the Act Required?

  1. Industries Covered by the Act:
    • The Act applies to industrial establishments as defined under the Act, such as:
      • Factories (as defined in the Factories Act, 1948).
      • Mines (as defined in the Mines Act, 1952).
      • Railways (other than military establishments).
      • Other industrial establishments notified by the government (e.g., plantations, docks, workshops, and other specified sectors).
  2. Workforce Size:
    • The Act applies to industrial establishments employing 100 or more workers on any day in the preceding 12 months.
    • State-specific thresholds: In some Indian states, the minimum workforce requirement for the Act’s applicability has been reduced to 50 or more workers (e.g., in Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan).
  3. Geographical Applicability:
    • The Act is applicable throughout India, including all states and union territories.
    • However, the specific rules and thresholds may vary by state, as states are empowered to amend the Act to suit their local industrial environment.
  4. Establishments Exempt from the Act:
    • Non-industrial establishments, such as purely service-oriented sectors (e.g., IT companies, retail shops), are generally not covered unless notified by the government.
    • Small establishments with fewer employees than the threshold (e.g., fewer than 100 workers, or fewer than 50 workers in states with amendments).
  5. When Notified by the Government:
    • Certain establishments may be brought under the purview of the Act by a specific government notification. For example, some states have extended the Act to apply to sectors like shops and commercial establishments.

Practical Examples of Where It is Enforced:

  • A factory in Maharashtra employing 150 workers.
  • A railway workshop employing 200 workers across multiple shifts.
  • A coal mine in Jharkhand employing more than 100 workers.
  • A plantation in Kerala where 120 workers are employed.

How is Required The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

image 42

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (often misreferenced as 1976) defines how employers in industrial establishments must implement and comply with its provisions. Here’s a step-by-step explanation of how the Act is required:

How is Compliance with the Act Required?

  1. Drafting of Standing Orders:
    • Employers’ Responsibility: Employers in industrial establishments must prepare and submit draft Standing Orders that specify the terms and conditions of employment for their workers.
    • Content Requirements: The Standing Orders must address:
      • Classification of workers (e.g., permanent, temporary, probationers).
      • Work hours, shifts, and attendance rules.
      • Leave and holidays (types of leave and conditions for availing them).
      • Discipline and misconduct procedures.
      • Grievance redressal mechanisms.
      • Termination and notice conditions.
  2. Submission for Certification:
    • The draft Standing Orders must be submitted to the Certifying Officer (usually the Labor Commissioner or a designated officer) within 6 months of the establishment becoming eligible under the Act.
    • The Certifying Officer ensures the Standing Orders are in line with the Act, the Model Standing Orders, and labor laws.
  3. Consultation with Workers:
    • Before finalizing the Standing Orders, the Certifying Officer consults:
      • Worker representatives or recognized trade unions.
      • Both parties are allowed to suggest amendments to ensure fairness and inclusivity.
  4. Certification of Standing Orders:
    • Once reviewed and approved by the Certifying Officer, the Standing Orders are certified.
    • The certified Standing Orders are binding on both employers and workers.
  5. Implementation and Display:
    • The certified Standing Orders must be:
      • Prominently displayed in the industrial establishment in a language understood by the majority of workers.
      • Communicated effectively to all employees.
  6. Adoption of Model Standing Orders:
    • If the employer fails to draft or submit Standing Orders, the Model Standing Orders prescribed by the government automatically apply to the establishment.
  7. Modification of Standing Orders:
    • Employers or workers may request changes to the Standing Orders if necessary (e.g., due to operational changes or legal updates).
    • Modifications must be approved by the Certifying Officer after consultation with both parties.
  8. Enforcement:
    • State labor authorities are responsible for monitoring compliance with the Act.
    • Non-compliance or violations may lead to fines and penalties for the employer.
  9. Use During Disputes:
    • Certified Standing Orders serve as a legal document during disputes, grievances, or disciplinary actions. Employers and workers are required to adhere strictly to these terms.
  10. Penalties for Non-Compliance:
    • Employers who fail to comply with the Act (e.g., by not submitting Standing Orders, violating certified terms, or not displaying them) can face penalties, including fines as specified under the Act.

How Employers Can Ensure Compliance:

  • Assign the HR department or legal team to draft and review Standing Orders.
  • Consult employees or their representatives during the preparation phase.
  • Submit the draft to the Certifying Officer within the required time frame.
  • Regularly update Standing Orders to reflect operational or legal changes.

By following these steps, establishments ensure transparency, minimize disputes, and comply with labor laws under the Act.

Case Study on The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

Here is a detailed case study on the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 to illustrate its implementation, challenges, and legal implications in a real-world scenario.

Case Study: Implementation and Dispute under the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

Background:

XYZ Manufacturing Ltd., a medium-sized industrial establishment in Maharashtra, employs around 150 workers in its factory. The company began operations in 2020 and rapidly grew its workforce, crossing the 100-worker threshold within a year. Despite this, the company failed to draft and submit the Standing Orders as required under the Act.

The Problem:

  1. Grievance by Workers:
    • Workers alleged arbitrary decisions by the management, including:
      • Unfair termination of a few probationary employees.
      • Lack of clarity on leave policies and disciplinary actions.
    • The absence of defined rules created confusion and dissatisfaction among the workforce.
  2. Union Involvement:
    • A trade union representing the workers filed a complaint with the labor authorities, claiming non-compliance with the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 by the employer.
  1. Complaint to the Certifying Officer:
    • The union submitted a formal complaint to the Certifying Officer, highlighting the absence of certified Standing Orders at XYZ Manufacturing Ltd.
    • The union also accused the employer of not adopting the Model Standing Orders, which should have applied in the absence of certified Standing Orders.
  2. Notice to the Employer:
    • The Certifying Officer issued a notice to XYZ Manufacturing Ltd., directing them to:
      • Submit draft Standing Orders within 30 days.
      • Justify their failure to comply with the Act.
  3. Hearing and Findings:
    • During the hearing, the Certifying Officer found that:
      • XYZ Manufacturing Ltd. had not submitted Standing Orders within the required timeframe (6 months after crossing the 100-employee threshold).
      • The company had also not adopted or followed the Model Standing Orders.

Resolution:

  1. Submission and Certification:
    • XYZ Manufacturing Ltd. was directed to immediately draft and submit Standing Orders.
    • The draft Standing Orders were reviewed and modified after consulting the union, ensuring compliance with the Model Standing Orders and fairness to workers.
  2. Implementation:
    • The certified Standing Orders were prominently displayed in the factory premises in Marathi and English, the languages understood by the majority of workers.
  3. Penalty Imposed:
    • XYZ Manufacturing Ltd. was fined for non-compliance as per Section 13 of the Act, which prescribes penalties for failure to submit Standing Orders or violating the provisions of the Act.
  4. Improved Relations:
    • With clear rules and policies in place, the workers’ grievances were resolved, leading to better workplace harmony and reduced disputes.

Key Learnings from the Case Study:

  1. Timely Compliance:
    • Employers must submit Standing Orders within 6 months of becoming eligible under the Act to avoid legal and workplace conflicts.
  2. Role of Certifying Officer:
    • The Certifying Officer plays a crucial role in enforcing compliance and ensuring Standing Orders are fair to both workers and employers.
  3. Importance of Transparency:
    • Clearly defined employment terms help minimize misunderstandings and disputes between employers and employees.
  4. Adopting Model Standing Orders:
    • In the absence of certified Standing Orders, the employer must follow the government’s Model Standing Orders.
  5. Penalties for Non-Compliance:
    • Non-compliance with the Act can result in financial penalties and damage to the employer’s reputation.

Conclusion:

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, ensures transparency and fairness in industrial employment practices. This case study highlights the importance of compliance for employers and the role of labor authorities in addressing worker grievances. By following the Act, both employers and employees can foster a more structured and harmonious work environment.

White paper on The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

Executive Summary

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 is a landmark piece of legislation in Indian labor law that mandates industrial establishments to define and communicate the terms and conditions of employment through Standing Orders. This Act aims to promote transparency, fairness, and industrial harmony by formalizing workplace rules and ensuring they are understood by all stakeholders. Although commonly referred to as a 1946 Act, its principles remain relevant today, particularly in evolving labor-intensive industries.

Background

Prior to the enactment of the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, many industrial establishments operated without clear, codified policies governing employer-employee relationships. This lack of transparency led to frequent disputes and exploitation of workers. The Act was introduced to standardize employment conditions and address these issues by mandating formalized workplace rules in the form of Standing Orders.

Key Objectives

The Act was designed with the following objectives:

  1. Codification of Employment Terms: To ensure that industrial establishments have clear, written terms governing employment.
  2. Reduction of Disputes: To minimize misunderstandings and disputes between employers and employees.
  3. Promotion of Industrial Harmony: To foster a structured and predictable workplace environment.
  4. Compliance with Labor Standards: To align employment practices with national labor laws and standards.

Scope and Applicability

  1. Applicability:
    • The Act applies to industrial establishments employing 100 or more workers (state amendments may reduce this threshold to 50 workers in some cases).
    • It includes factories, mines, railways, and other notified industrial establishments.
  2. Exemptions:
    • Establishments with fewer workers or non-industrial sectors, unless specifically notified by the government, are generally exempt.
  3. Geographical Coverage:
    • The Act is applicable throughout India, with individual states empowered to modify specific provisions.

Key Provisions of the Act

  1. Definition of Standing Orders:
    • Standing Orders are written rules outlining employment terms, including classifications, working hours, leave policies, disciplinary actions, grievance mechanisms, and termination processes.
  2. Submission of Draft Standing Orders:
    • Employers must submit draft Standing Orders to the Certifying Officer within six months of the establishment becoming subject to the Act.
  3. Certification Process:
    • The Certifying Officer reviews the draft Standing Orders to ensure compliance with the Act and the Model Standing Orders.
    • Workers or their representatives are consulted during this process.
  4. Model Standing Orders:
    • If an employer fails to submit draft Standing Orders, the government’s prescribed Model Standing Orders are automatically applicable.
  5. Modification of Standing Orders:
    • Modifications can be proposed by employers or workers, subject to approval by the Certifying Officer.
  6. Communication and Display:
    • Certified Standing Orders must be prominently displayed at the workplace in a language understood by the majority of workers.
  7. Penalties for Non-Compliance:
    • Employers who fail to comply with the Act face fines and other penalties as prescribed.

Industrial Application of the Act

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, finds widespread application across various industries. Below are some examples of how it is applied in industrial settings:

  1. Manufacturing Sector:
    • Factories producing goods such as textiles, automobiles, and electronics rely on Standing Orders to define worker classifications (e.g., permanent, contract, or temporary employees) and ensure compliance with safety, attendance, and disciplinary rules.
    • In industries with multiple shifts, Standing Orders provide clarity on shift timing, overtime rules, and leave policies, reducing misunderstandings and disputes.
  2. Mining Industry:
    • Mines employing large workforces use Standing Orders to address worker safety protocols, equipment usage rules, and procedures for reporting workplace hazards. This ensures compliance with both labor laws and environmental standards.
  3. IT and ITES (Where Notified):
    • In states that have extended the Act to IT and ITES sectors, companies use Standing Orders to formalize remote work policies, grievance redressal mechanisms, and rules governing employee conduct.
  4. Plantations and Agriculture:
    • Plantation industries, such as tea and coffee estates, implement Standing Orders to specify working hours, housing benefits for workers, and leave entitlements during peak and non-peak seasons.
  5. Transportation and Logistics:
    • Railways and logistics companies rely on Standing Orders to ensure transparency in worker scheduling, handling of absenteeism, and disciplinary actions for misconduct.
  6. Construction Industry:
    • Construction companies employ Standing Orders to address safety protocols, classification of workers, and rules for termination or lay-offs due to project completion.

Benefits of the Act

  1. For Employers:
    • Reduces disputes by providing a clear framework for handling grievances and disciplinary actions.
    • Enhances organizational transparency and legal compliance.
  2. For Employees:
    • Protects workers from arbitrary actions and ensures clarity regarding their rights and obligations.
    • Provides a formal mechanism for addressing grievances.
  3. For Industrial Relations:
    • Promotes harmony and mutual understanding between employers and employees.
    • Reduces the scope for industrial unrest by codifying terms of employment.

Challenges in Implementation

  1. Delayed Compliance:
    • Many establishments fail to submit draft Standing Orders within the prescribed timeframe.
  2. Limited Awareness:
    • Both employers and employees may lack awareness of their rights and obligations under the Act.
  3. State-Level Variations:
    • Different thresholds and amendments across states create inconsistencies in applicability and enforcement.
  4. Bureaucratic Hurdles:
    • The certification process can be time-consuming and prone to delays due to bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Case Studies

  1. XYZ Manufacturing Ltd.:
    • A mid-sized factory in Maharashtra with over 150 employees faced unrest due to unclear leave policies and disciplinary procedures. The absence of certified Standing Orders led to worker protests and a union complaint. Upon intervention, the Certifying Officer mandated the adoption of Model Standing Orders, resolving the disputes and restoring workplace harmony.
  2. ABC Textiles:
    • A textile company in Rajasthan proactively submitted its draft Standing Orders and involved workers in the consultation process. This transparent approach enhanced trust between management and workers, reducing grievances and improving productivity.

Recommendations

  1. Awareness Campaigns:
    • Conduct awareness programs for employers and workers to educate them on the Act’s provisions and benefits.
  2. Streamlined Certification Process:
    • Simplify and digitize the process for submitting and certifying Standing Orders to reduce delays.
  3. Uniform Applicability:
    • Harmonize state-level variations to ensure consistent enforcement across India.
  4. Regular Updates:
    • Revise the Model Standing Orders periodically to address evolving workplace dynamics and emerging sectors.

Conclusion

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 remains a vital tool for fostering transparency, fairness, and harmony in industrial establishments. While its implementation poses certain challenges, proactive measures by both employers and authorities can ensure its effectiveness in promoting equitable labor practices. As workplaces evolve, the Act must be updated to address the needs of modern industries and ensure its continued relevance.

References

  1. The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.
  2. Government of India’s Model Standing Orders.
  3. State-specific amendments to the Act.

Industrial Application of The Employment (Standing Order Act) 1976

Executive Summary

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 is a landmark piece of legislation in Indian labor law that mandates industrial establishments to define and communicate the terms and conditions of employment through Standing Orders. This Act aims to promote transparency, fairness, and industrial harmony by formalizing workplace rules and ensuring they are understood by all stakeholders. Although commonly referred to as a 1946 Act, its principles remain relevant today, particularly in evolving labor-intensive industries.

Background

Prior to the enactment of the Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, many industrial establishments operated without clear, codified policies governing employer-employee relationships. This lack of transparency led to frequent disputes and exploitation of workers. The Act was introduced to standardize employment conditions and address these issues by mandating formalized workplace rules in the form of Standing Orders.

Key Objectives

The Act was designed with the following objectives:

  1. Codification of Employment Terms: To ensure that industrial establishments have clear, written terms governing employment.
  2. Reduction of Disputes: To minimize misunderstandings and disputes between employers and employees.
  3. Promotion of Industrial Harmony: To foster a structured and predictable workplace environment.
  4. Compliance with Labor Standards: To align employment practices with national labor laws and standards.

Scope and Applicability

  1. Applicability:
    • The Act applies to industrial establishments employing 100 or more workers (state amendments may reduce this threshold to 50 workers in some cases).
    • It includes factories, mines, railways, and other notified industrial establishments.
  2. Exemptions:
    • Establishments with fewer workers or non-industrial sectors, unless specifically notified by the government, are generally exempt.
  3. Geographical Coverage:
    • The Act is applicable throughout India, with individual states empowered to modify specific provisions.

Key Provisions of the Act

  1. Definition of Standing Orders:
    • Standing Orders are written rules outlining employment terms, including classifications, working hours, leave policies, disciplinary actions, grievance mechanisms, and termination processes.
  2. Submission of Draft Standing Orders:
    • Employers must submit draft Standing Orders to the Certifying Officer within six months of the establishment becoming subject to the Act.
  3. Certification Process:
    • The Certifying Officer reviews the draft Standing Orders to ensure compliance with the Act and the Model Standing Orders.
    • Workers or their representatives are consulted during this process.
  4. Model Standing Orders:
    • If an employer fails to submit draft Standing Orders, the government’s prescribed Model Standing Orders are automatically applicable.
  5. Modification of Standing Orders:
    • Modifications can be proposed by employers or workers, subject to approval by the Certifying Officer.
  6. Communication and Display:
    • Certified Standing Orders must be prominently displayed at the workplace in a language understood by the majority of workers.
  7. Penalties for Non-Compliance:
    • Employers who fail to comply with the Act face fines and other penalties as prescribed.

Industrial Application of the Act

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, finds widespread application across various industries. Below are some examples of how it is applied in industrial settings:

  1. Manufacturing Sector:
    • Factories producing goods such as textiles, automobiles, and electronics rely on Standing Orders to define worker classifications (e.g., permanent, contract, or temporary employees) and ensure compliance with safety, attendance, and disciplinary rules.
    • In industries with multiple shifts, Standing Orders provide clarity on shift timing, overtime rules, and leave policies, reducing misunderstandings and disputes.
  2. Mining Industry:
    • Mines employing large workforces use Standing Orders to address worker safety protocols, equipment usage rules, and procedures for reporting workplace hazards. This ensures compliance with both labor laws and environmental standards.
  3. IT and ITES (Where Notified):
    • In states that have extended the Act to IT and ITES sectors, companies use Standing Orders to formalize remote work policies, grievance redressal mechanisms, and rules governing employee conduct.
  4. Plantations and Agriculture:
    • Plantation industries, such as tea and coffee estates, implement Standing Orders to specify working hours, housing benefits for workers, and leave entitlements during peak and non-peak seasons.
  5. Transportation and Logistics:
    • Railways and logistics companies rely on Standing Orders to ensure transparency in worker scheduling, handling of absenteeism, and disciplinary actions for misconduct.
  6. Construction Industry:
    • Construction companies employ Standing Orders to address safety protocols, classification of workers, and rules for termination or lay-offs due to project completion.

Benefits of the Act

  1. For Employers:
    • Reduces disputes by providing a clear framework for handling grievances and disciplinary actions.
    • Enhances organizational transparency and legal compliance.
  2. For Employees:
    • Protects workers from arbitrary actions and ensures clarity regarding their rights and obligations.
    • Provides a formal mechanism for addressing grievances.
  3. For Industrial Relations:
    • Promotes harmony and mutual understanding between employers and employees.
    • Reduces the scope for industrial unrest by codifying terms of employment.

Challenges in Implementation

  1. Delayed Compliance:
    • Many establishments fail to submit draft Standing Orders within the prescribed timeframe.
  2. Limited Awareness:
    • Both employers and employees may lack awareness of their rights and obligations under the Act.
  3. State-Level Variations:
    • Different thresholds and amendments across states create inconsistencies in applicability and enforcement.
  4. Bureaucratic Hurdles:
    • The certification process can be time-consuming and prone to delays due to bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Case Studies

  1. XYZ Manufacturing Ltd.:
    • A mid-sized factory in Maharashtra with over 150 employees faced unrest due to unclear leave policies and disciplinary procedures. The absence of certified Standing Orders led to worker protests and a union complaint. Upon intervention, the Certifying Officer mandated the adoption of Model Standing Orders, resolving the disputes and restoring workplace harmony.
  2. ABC Textiles:
    • A textile company in Rajasthan proactively submitted its draft Standing Orders and involved workers in the consultation process. This transparent approach enhanced trust between management and workers, reducing grievances and improving productivity.

Recommendations

  1. Awareness Campaigns:
    • Conduct awareness programs for employers and workers to educate them on the Act’s provisions and benefits.
  2. Streamlined Certification Process:
    • Simplify and digitize the process for submitting and certifying Standing Orders to reduce delays.
  3. Uniform Applicability:
    • Harmonize state-level variations to ensure consistent enforcement across India.
  4. Regular Updates:
    • Revise the Model Standing Orders periodically to address evolving workplace dynamics and emerging sectors.

Conclusion

The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 remains a vital tool for fostering transparency, fairness, and harmony in industrial establishments. While its implementation poses certain challenges, proactive measures by both employers and authorities can ensure its effectiveness in promoting equitable labor practices. As workplaces evolve, the Act must be updated to address the needs of modern industries and ensure its continued relevance.

References

  1. The Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.
  2. Government of India’s Model Standing Orders.
  3. State-specific amendments to the Act.

Notes

[edit]

  1. ^ “Labor force, total – India | Data”.
  2. ^ https://who-ilo-joint-estimates.shinyapps.io/OccupationalBurdenOfDisease/
  3. ^ “Summary of Labour Codes 2020”. Labour Codes 2020. 29 March 2021. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
  4. ^ Dougherty, S., R. Herd and T. Chalaux (2009), “What is holding back productivity growth in India ?: Recent microevidence”, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, vol. 2009/1, doi:10.1787/eco_studies-v2009-art3-en.
  5. ^ Sapovadia, Vrajlal K., Low Productivity: India’s Bottleneck of Growth (May 21, 2019). Available at SSRN: SSRN 3391621 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.3391621
  6. ^ Bloom, Nicholas, Aprajit Mahajan, David McKenzie, and John Roberts. 2010. “Why Do Firms in Developing Countries Have Low Productivity?” American Economic Review, 100 (2): 619–23. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.619
  7. ^ Sivadasan, Jagadeesh. “Barriers to Competition and Productivity: Evidence from India” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 9, no. 1, 2009. doi:10.2202/1935-1682.2161
  8. ^ Goldar, B., Krishna, K.L., Aggarwal, S.C. et al. Productivity growth in India since the 1980s: the KLEMS approach. Ind. Econ. Rev. 52, 37–71 (2017). doi:10.1007/s41775-017-0002-y
  9. ^ “Industrial Acts and Legislations: Trade Unions Act”. Business – India. Government of India. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 21 January 2020.
  10. ^ Roy, Tirthankar (2016). Law and the Economy in Colonial India. University of Chicago Press. p. 118. ISBN 9780226387789.
  11. ^ Constitution of India, article 37
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b See Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act 1976 s 9
  13. ^ “Industrial Disputes Act, 1947”. nyaaya.in. Archived from the original on 16 March 2017. Retrieved 16 March 2017.
  14. ^ Mehul Srivastava, India Labour Laws Bloomberg Businessweek
  15. ^ Nomani, M.Z.M. (2012). Dominic Keating (ed.). Synergy of Trade Secret Legislations, Competition Laws and Innovation Protection Statutes under Emerging Intellectual Property Rights Regime: A Comparative and Indo-U.S. Perspective. NOIDA: Amity University Press: NOIDA. pp. 63–79.
  16. ^ Nomani, M.Z.M. & Hussain Z. (2020). “Ecological Nuisance and Common Law Environmentalism: Relevance and Revival in Combating Environmental Pollution in India”. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems. 12 (5): 1197–1204. doi:10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP5/20201874. S2CID 225802893.
  17. ^ Nomani, M.Z.M. (2011). “Intellection of Trade Secret and Innovation Laws in India”. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 16 (4): 341–350.
  18. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Aditya Gupta. “How wrong has the Indian Left been about economic reforms?” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2009. Retrieved 20 February 2009.
  19. ^ “Indian Railways Institute of Civil Engineering”. Archived from the original on 9 April 2010. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
  20. ^ Rule 62, P&T manual Vol III, Government of India
  21. ^ C. Krishnamurthi. Dies Non (No Work No Pay) in Banking Industry ISBN 978-81-8387-226-3
  22. ^ “Payment of Wages Act 1936” (PDF). Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  23. ^ “Minimum Wages Act 1948” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 November 2014. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  24. ^ “Payment of Gratuity Act, Gratuity Act 1972” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  25. ^ “Payment of Bonus Act 1965” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 October 2012. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  26. ^ http://vikaspedia.in/social-welfare/unorganised-sector-1/weekly-holidays-act-1942 [bare URL]
  27. ^ “Archived copy” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 September 2018. Retrieved 9 August 2018.
  28. ^ “Workmen’s Compensation Act 1923” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  29. ^ “Social Security in India” (PDF). The Government of India. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 January 2012.
  30. ^ Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 Archived 21 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  31. ^ See Employees’ State Insurance Act 1948 Archived 21 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  32. ^ “Maternity Benefit Act 1961” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  33. ^ See The Employees’ Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act,1952
  34. ^ Trade Unions Act 1926 Archived 21 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine
  35. ^ As Gandhi said, “my advice to the employers would be that they should willingly regard the workers as the real owners of the concerns which they fancy they have created” in ‘Harijan’ (31 March 1946) reproduced in R Iyer (ed), The Moral and Political Writing of Mahatma Gandhi (1987) vol 3, 197-199
  36. ^ Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, Report of the High-Powered Expert Committee on Companies and Maintenance of Restrictive Trade Practices Acts Archived 3 August 2016 at the Wayback Machine (1978)
  37. ^ 1983 AIR 75, 1983 SCR (1) 9. Noted by J Cottrell, ‘Indian Judicial Activism, the Company and the Worker: A Note on National Textile Workers Union v Ramakrishnan’ (1990) 39(2) The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 433
  38. ^ Fundamental Rules, Government of India
  39. ^ Mishra, Abhishek (10 February 2021). “Homosexuality not a ground to sack employee, rules Allahabad High Court”. India Today. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
  40. ^ “Indian Supreme Court curbs one of the world’s most powerful anti-discrimination laws”.
  41. ^ RS Srivastava, ‘Bonded Labor in India: Its Incidence and Pattern’ (2005) Cornell University Working Paper
  42. ^ International Labour Organization, “National Legislation and Policies Against Child Labour in India” (2011 Archived 9 August 2012 at the Wayback Machine)
  43. ^ India Labour Regulations OECD
  44. ^ Parul Sharma (February 2007). “Split Legal Regime in India’s Labour Laws” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 October 2015.
  45. ^ Basu et al, Retrenchment, Labor Laws and Government Policy: An Analysis with Special Reference to India, The World Bank
  46. ^ Lalit Bhasin, Labour and Employment Laws of India Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine United Nations
  47. ^ Financial Times, Sleepy System, 21 January 2005
  48. ^ Supreme Court of India, Bharat Forge Co. Ltd vs Uttam Manohar Nakate on 18 January 2005, CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 4399 of 2002
  49. ^ Industries (Development and Regulation) Act 1951 Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  50. ^ Jump up to:a b Goldman Sachs says reforms to create 110 mn jobs for economy in 10 yrs Business Today, March 2014
  51. ^ Goldman Thumbs Up for Gujarat Model The Times of India
  52. ^ “Employing Workers – 2011 data (based on input from ILO, OECD, local governments and private employers)”. The World Bank. 2012.
  53. ^ “Revised VDA (Minimum Wages) wef 01 April 2022 Chief Labour Commissione”. clc.gov.in. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  54. ^ “Fair Labor Association Secures Commitment to Limit Workers’ Hours, Protect Pay at Apple’s Largest Supplier – Fair Labor Association”. www.fairlabor.org. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
  55. ^ Gordon, Li, Xu (12 August 2010). “Labor regulation, economic complexity, and the China-India gap” (PDF). Hamilton University.
  56. ^ Adhvaryu, Chari and Sharma (December 2009). “Firing costs and flexibility:evidence from firms employment responses to economic shocks” (PDF). Yale University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 May 2013.
  57. ^ “IMF calls for urgent reform in Indian labour laws”. Archived from the original on 6 August 2007. Retrieved 27 March 2012.
  58. ^ Kaushik Basu; Gary S. Fields; Shub Debgupta. “Retrenchment, Labor Laws and Government Policy: An Analysis with Special Reference to India” (PDF). World Bank.
  59. ^ R. C. Datta / Milly Sil. “Contemporary Issues on Labour Law Reform in India” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 February 2009. Retrieved 20 February 2009.
  60. ^ “Economic survey of India 2007: Policy Brief” (PDF). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2011.
  61. ^ Basu, Kaushik (27 June 2005). “Why India needs labour law reform”. BBC.
  62. ^ Jump up to:a b c “India Country Overview 2008”. World Bank. 2008. Archived from the original on 22 May 2011. Retrieved 20 February 2009.
  63. ^ “A special report on India: An elephant, not a tiger”. The Economist. 11 December 2008.
  64. ^ Gurcharan Das (July–August 2006). “The India Model”. Foreign Affairs. Archived from the original on 7 March 2009.
  65. ^ World Bank, India Country Overview 2008
  66. ^ “New labour laws needed, says Manmohan”. The Hindu. Chennai, India. 10 December 2005. Archived from the original on 11 December 2005.
Tags: , , , , , ,